Memory Buffer Bounds ErrorWeakness · CWE-119

CVE-2025-20005

MEDIUM · 5.6 CVSS v4.0 Published 2026-03-10
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper buffer restrictions in some UEFI firmware for some Intel(R) reference platforms may allow an escalation of privilege. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a high complexity attack may enable data manipulation. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (none), integrity (high) and availability (low) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is a UEFI firmware vulnerability in Intel reference platforms involving improper buffer restrictions. It allows a privileged system software adversary to achieve escalation of privilege and data manipulation through local access with high attack complexity and no user interaction.

MitigationApply the Intel UEFI firmware update for affected platforms once released. Given the firmware-level nature and high integrity impact, organizations should prioritize patching and verify update integrity through vendor-provided cryptographic signatures.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
High
Privileges
High
Authentication
X
User interaction
None
Scope
X

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the Intel platform model
    Run 'dmidecode -s system-product-name' or check BIOS/UEFI setup screen for the system model name. Intel reference platforms typically show as 'Reference Board' or similar OEM designations.
    Affected if The system is an Intel reference platform (not a retail commercial product with its own firmware branch)
  2. Determine the installed UEFI firmware version
    Run 'dmidecode -s bios-version' or access UEFI Setup > Main/Information to view the BIOS/UEFI firmware revision string.
    Affected if The displayed firmware version falls within an unpatched release branch for the identified platform
  3. Check UEFI variable store integrity
    From an elevated command prompt, run 'bcdedit /enum firmware' to enumerate firmware boot entries, or use 'fwutil.sh firmware version' if available on the system.
    Affected if Firmware variables show unexpected modifications or the firmware version cannot be verified against Intel's published patch level
  4. Verify secure boot configuration
    Access UEFI Setup > Secure Boot and confirm Secure Boot is enabled, or run 'sbctl status' (Linux) or 'Get-SecureBootUEFI' (Windows PowerShell) from an OS with admin rights.
    Affected if Secure Boot is disabled or shows a configuration mismatch indicating potential firmware tampering

The system is affected if it is an Intel reference platform running a UEFI firmware version that has not been patched to the corrected release; firmware-level detection requires version comparison against Intel's advisory and verification of firmware integrity controls.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the Intel UEFI firmware update for affected platforms once released. Given the firmware-level nature and high integrity impact, organizations should prioritize patching and verify update integrity through vendor-provided cryptographic signatures.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20005 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20005 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data