Uncontrolled Search Path (DLL Hijack)Weakness · CWE-427

CVE-2025-20048

MEDIUM · 6.7 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-08-12
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
67/100
Remediation priority · Elevated

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Uncontrolled search path for the Intel(R) Trace Analyzer and Collector software all verions may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Intel Trace Analyzer and Collector contains an uncontrolled search path vulnerability (DLL hijacking) allowing an authenticated local attacker to place malicious DLLs in directories the application searches when loading libraries. If the application runs with elevated privileges, the attacker can achieve privilege escalation by having their DLL loaded instead of the legitimate one.

MitigationApply vendor-provided patches when available. As a workaround, secure all directories in the application DLL search path by removing write permissions for untrusted users and verifying only trusted DLLs exist in those locations. Consider running the application with least privilege until patched.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
High
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Intel Trace Analyzer or Collector is installed
    Check for the application in standard installation directories (typically C:\Program Files\Intel\ or C:\Program Files (x86)\Intel\) or query the Windows Registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall for Intel Trace Analyzer or Intel Trace Collector entries
    Affected if The software is present on the system
  2. Identify installed version
    Locate the version information in the application's installation folder (often in a version.txt, about.txt, or in the executable's properties) or via the registry uninstall entry
    Affected if The installed version matches the affected version range (if patches have not been applied) or is an unpatched version prior to vendor fix
  3. Check if application runs with elevated privileges
    Review any scheduled tasks, services, or shortcuts that launch Intel Trace Analyzer/Collector with 'Run as administrator' or via privileged accounts. Examine the application manifest and any installation documentation for recommended execution context
    Affected if The application is configured to run with elevated privileges (administrator or system account)
  4. Identify writable directories in DLL search path
    Use Process Monitor or similar tooling to observe DLL search paths when the application loads. Check permissions on directories in the application binary path, working directory, and system paths (C:\Windows\System32, C:\Windows\SysWOW64, PATH environment variable directories) to identify locations where an untrusted user could place files
    Affected if Any directory in the application's DLL search path is writable by an untrusted authenticated user

The system is affected if Intel Trace Analyzer or Collector is installed, runs with elevated privileges, and contains writable directories in its DLL search path accessible to untrusted authenticated users.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor-provided patches when available. As a workaround, secure all directories in the application DLL search path by removing write permissions for untrusted users and verifying only trusted DLLs exist in those locations. Consider running the application with least privilege until patched.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20048 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20048 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data