CVE-2025-20061
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedmySCADA myPRO does not properly neutralize POST requests sent to a specific port with email information. This vulnerability could be exploited by an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the affected system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencemySCADA myPRO contains a command injection vulnerability where POST requests to a specific port with email-related parameters are not properly sanitized, allowing attackers to inject and execute arbitrary operating system commands on the affected device.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate mySCADA myPRO installationSearch for the myPRO application directory. Common locations include C:\Program Files\mySCADA on Windows or /opt/mySCADA on Linux. Look for myPRO executable files or service entries.Affected if mySCADA myPRO software is present on the system
-
Determine installed myPRO versionCheck the application version through the web interface (typically accessible via the main port), or inspect version information in the installation directory (such as version.dll or a version.txt file). Compare your version against any affected version ranges published for CVE-2025-20061.Affected if The installed version matches an affected version range or is older than patched versions
-
Identify exposed web service portsReview myPRO configuration files (often in config or settings subdirectories) to identify which ports the web server listens on. Use netstat or similar tools to confirm listening services associated with myPRO.Affected if The myPRO web interface is listening on any accessible port
-
Check if email features are enabledExamine myPRO configuration for SMTP/email settings. Look for email notification configuration, alert settings, or any mail-related modules in the myPRO control panel or configuration files.Affected if Email-related features, SMTP settings, or email notification modules are configured or enabled
-
Inspect for signs of command injectionReview myPRO server logs, system event logs, and any available audit trails for suspicious patterns such as shell metacharacters (|, ;, &, $) in POST requests, unexpected command executions, or unfamiliar processes spawned from the myPRO service.Affected if Logs contain evidence of arbitrary command execution or suspicious POST requests with shell syntax
If mySCADA myPRO is installed with email features enabled and the web service is accessible, the environment may be vulnerable to command injection via crafted email-related POST requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict input validation and sanitization on all email-related POST parameters, use parameterized queries or safe API methods instead of shell commands, and restrict network access to the affected port.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20061 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20061 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data