dbcve.org
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)Weakness · CWE-918

CVE-2025-20075

HIGH · 7.2 CVSS v3.0 Published 2025-02-18
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in FileMegane versions above 3.0.0.0 prior to 3.4.0.0. Executing arbitrary backend Web API requests could potentially lead to rebooting the services.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in FileMegane allows attackers to force the server to execute arbitrary backend Web API requests, which could trigger service disruptions including potential service reboots.

MitigationUpgrade FileMegane to version 3.4.0.0 or later. Additionally, implement network segmentation and outbound request filtering to limit what internal resources the application server can access.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate FileMegane installation and version
    Find the FileMegane application directory or check the software inventory/registry for the installed version number
    Affected if Unable to determine version or version is unknown
  2. Compare installed version to fixed release
    Compare the found version against version 3.4.0.0 - any version lower than 3.4.0.0 is in the affected range
    Affected if Installed version is less than 3.4.0.0
  3. Verify web API functionality is accessible
    Check if FileMegane exposes any web API endpoints or HTTP request handling features that accept user-supplied URLs or endpoints
    Affected if API or URL-fetching features are exposed to untrusted users
  4. Review network configuration for internal access
    Inspect network/firewall rules to determine if the server can reach internal services, databases, or management interfaces
    Affected if Server has outbound network access to sensitive internal resources

Environment is affected if FileMegane version is below 3.4.0.0 and the application exposes web API or URL request functionality that could be exploited for SSRF.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade FileMegane to version 3.4.0.0 or later. Additionally, implement network segmentation and outbound request filtering to limit what internal resources the application server can access.

Recommended fix High confidence

3.4.0.0

  1. 1. Identify the currently installed version of FileMegane (check application metadata or version display)
  2. 2. Confirm the installed version is 3.0.0.0 or higher but prior to 3.4.0.0 (vulnerable range)
  3. 3. Obtain FileMegane version 3.4.0.0 from the official vendor (info-brdg.co.jp) or trusted distribution channel
  4. 4. Back up current configuration and data according to vendor backup procedures
  5. 5. Uninstall the current version or replace with version 3.4.0.0 following vendor installation instructions
  6. 6. Verify the new version 3.4.0.0 is correctly installed
  7. 7. Test that the application functions normally and that the SSRF vulnerability is no longer exploitable

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,210
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,936.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20075 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20075 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data