CVE-2025-20088
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMattermost versions 10.2.x <= 10.2.0, 9.11.x <= 9.11.5, 10.0.x <= 10.0.3, 10.1.x <= 10.1.3 fail to properly validate post props which allows a malicious authenticated user to cause a crash via a malicious post.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMattermost fails to properly validate post properties (post props), allowing an authenticated malicious user to send specially crafted posts with malformed props that cause the server to crash (denial of service). The vulnerability exists across multiple versions in the 9.x and 10.x branches due to missing or insufficient input validation on post metadata.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 9.11.0, < 9.11.6>= 10.0.0, < 10.0.4>= 10.1.0, < 10.1.4= 10.2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Mattermost Server versionRun 'mattermost version' from the server command line, or access the System Console > About page in the web UI, or check the /api/v4/system/about endpointAffected if The version is 9.11.0 through 9.11.5, 10.0.0 through 10.0.3, 10.1.0 through 10.1.3, or exactly 10.2.0. These versions are within the affected ranges.
-
Confirm Mattermost is configured to accept posts from authenticated usersVerify that user authentication is enabled and users have permissions to create posts. Check System Console > Users and Teams > Teams or verify authentication method in System Console > AuthenticationAffected if The server allows authenticated users to post. The vulnerability requires an authenticated user to send malformed post props, so if posting is restricted to system admins only, the attack surface is reduced but not eliminated.
-
Check if the server has any API request logging or audit logsReview Mattermost logs in the /var/log/mattermost directory or via the System Console > Logs. Look for patterns of post creation API calls (/api/v4/posts) that may indicate exploitation attemptsAffected if Logs show abnormal post creation patterns, high volumes of post API requests, or server crash events correlating with specific post submissions from regular users.
-
Verify server accessibility to non-admin usersReview user roles and permissions in System Console > User Management > Roles. Determine if regular users or guest accounts can create posts in any channelAffected if Regular authenticated users (non-admin) have post creation permissions, which is required for this vulnerability to be exploitable.
If the Mattermost Server version falls within any of the affected ranges (9.11.0-9.11.5, 10.0.0-10.0.3, 10.1.0-10.1.3, or 10.2.0) AND the server allows authenticated users to create posts, the environment is affected by this CVE.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.11.610.0.410.1.4
Upgrade Mattermost to versions 10.2.1, 10.1.4, 10.0.4, or 9.11.6 or later which contain proper post props validation. As a compensating control, limit user permissions or monitor for abnormal post creation patterns.
9.11.6, 10.0.4, 10.1.4, or 10.2.1 (depending on your current major version)
- Identify the currently installed Mattermost Server version using the system console or mmctl command
- Backup the Mattermost database and config file before upgrading
- For Mattermost 9.11.x: upgrade to version 9.11.6 or later
- For Mattermost 10.0.x: upgrade to version 10.0.4 or later
- For Mattermost 10.1.x: upgrade to version 10.1.4 or later
- For Mattermost 10.2.0: upgrade to version 10.2.1 or later when available
- Follow standard Mattermost upgrade documentation for your deployment method (docker, helm, or manual)
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the server version in the system console
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20088 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20088 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data