CVE-2025-20105
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper input validation in some UEFI firmware SMM module for the Intel(R) reference platforms may allow an escalation of privilege. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable local code execution. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) impacts.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an improper input validation vulnerability in a UEFI firmware SMM (System Management Mode) module on Intel reference platforms. SMM is a highly privileged CPU mode that operates below the OS, making this a critical firmware flaw. A local attacker with privileged user access can exploit the input validation failure to execute code in SMM, achieving privilege escalation to the highest possible level on the system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the system firmware vendorCheck the system's UEFI/BIOS information during boot or via tools like 'dmidecode', 'uefi-info', or the vendor's hardware diagnostics. Determine if the firmware is from Intel or an OEM using Intel reference platform firmware.Affected if The system uses Intel reference platform firmware or an OEM system derived from Intel reference designs.
-
Check installed UEFI firmware versionRetrieve the current firmware version from the UEFI/BIOS setup menu, or use commands like 'dmidecode -s bios-version', 'fwupdtool get-devices', or vendor-specific tools. Record the exact version string.Affected if The installed firmware version matches an affected Intel reference platform release that has not been patched.
-
Verify SMM is enabledCheck SMM configuration in UEFI/BIOS settings (often under 'Advanced' or 'Security' menus), or use tools like 'intel-smm-swap' or 'chipsec' to query SMM configuration. Confirm SMM is present and operational.Affected if SMM is enabled and present on the system (this is the default state for most Intel platforms).
-
Check for SMM integrity violationsUse system integrity measurement tools such as TPM event logs, 'tpm2_pcrread', or Intel's SMM configuration integrity checking tools. Look for unexpected SMM entries or code that may indicate exploitation.Affected if Unauthorized or unexpected SMM code entries are detected in TPM measurements or SMM integrity logs.
If the system uses Intel reference platform UEFI firmware and the installed version is among the affected releases that have not been patched, the environment is vulnerable to SMM privilege escalation via this input validation flaw.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the Intel firmware update (BIOS/UEFI update) for affected platforms once released. This requires updating the system firmware from the vendor, as there's no software-only workaround for SMM vulnerabilities.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20105 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20105 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data