CVE-2025-20154
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) server feature of Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the affected device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. For Cisco IOS XR Software, this vulnerability could cause the ipsla_ippm_server process to reload unexpectedly if debugs are enabled. This vulnerability is due to out-of-bounds array access when processing specially crafted TWAMP control packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted TWAMP control packets to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the affected device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition. Note: For Cisco IOS XR Software, only the ipsla_ippm_server process reloads unexpectedly and only when debugs are enabled. The vulnerability details for Cisco IOS XR Software are as follows: Security Impact Rating (SIR): Low CVSS Base Score: 3.7 CVSS Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in the TWAMP server feature of Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause device reload (DoS) by sending specially crafted TWAMP control packets. The root cause is out-of-bounds array access when processing these packets. For Cisco IOS XR, only the ipsla_ippm_server process crashes, and only when debugs are enabled.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 15.9\(3\)m11>= 16.6.1, <= 17.2.3= 6.5.1= 6.5.2= 6.5.3= 6.5.15= 6.5.25= 6.5.26= 6.5.28= 6.5.29= 6.5.31= 6.5.32= 6.5.33= 6.5.35CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Cisco software versionRun 'show version' on the device console or via SSH to retrieve the installed IOS, IOS XE, or IOS XR version string.Affected if The version falls within any of these ranges: iOS <= 15.9(3)m11, IOS XE >= 16.6.1 and <= 17.2.3, or IOS XR version 6.5.1, 6.5.2, 6.5.3, 6.5.15, 6.5.25, 6.5.26, 6.5.28, 6.5.29, 6.5.31, 6.5.32, 6.5.33, or 6.5.35.
-
Verify if TWAMP server is configuredRun 'show running-config | include twamp' or 'show twamp server status' (if available on the platform) to check whether the TWAMP server feature is enabled in the current configuration.Affected if TWAMP server is enabled and the device is running a vulnerable software version.
-
Check for active TWAMP listenerRun 'show tcp brief | include twamp' or 'show udp brief | include twamp' to see if the device is listening on TWAMP ports (typically UDP port 862).Affected if The device has an active TWAMP server listener and runs a vulnerable software version.
The device is affected if it runs a software version within the specified vulnerable ranges AND has the TWAMP server feature enabled or configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Cisco security updates when available. For IOS XR, disable debugs on the ipsla_ippm_server process as a workaround. Consider disabling the TWAMP server feature if not required.
Cisco IOS XE 17.3.1 or later (17.x latest stable); Cisco IOS XR 6.6.1 or later; Cisco IOS 15.x is End-of-Life - migrate to IOS XE
- 1. Identify the current Cisco IOS/IOS XE/IOS XR version on the device using 'show version'
- 2. For Cisco IOS: Upgrade to a version newer than 15.9(3)m11 (Cisco IOS 15.x is End-of-Life; consider migrating to IOS XE)
- 3. For Cisco IOS XE: Upgrade to version 17.3 or later (17.3.1 or latest stable 17.x release) to resolve the TWAMP server vulnerability
- 4. For Cisco IOS XR: Upgrade to version 6.6.1 or later to resolve the ipsla_ippm_server process vulnerability
- 5. After upgrade, verify the device configuration for TWAMP server feature if not needed: use 'no twamp server' in global configuration to disable if unused
- 6. For IOS XR: Ensure debugs are disabled in production unless actively troubleshooting, as debugs were required for the IOS XR attack vector
- 7. Reload the device and verify normal operation post-upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20154 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20154 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data