Nexus DashboardApplication · Cisco

CVE-2025-20163

HIGH · 8.7 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-06-04
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 3.2 or later.
See remediation →
96/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the SSH implementation of Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (NDFC) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to impersonate Cisco NDFC-managed devices. This vulnerability is due to insufficient SSH host key validation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by performing a machine-in-the-middle attack on SSH connections to Cisco NDFC-managed devices, which could allow an attacker to intercept this traffic. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to impersonate a managed device and capture user credentials.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The SSH implementation in Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller lacks proper host key validation, allowing an attacker positioned between NDFC and managed devices to intercept SSH traffic via machine-in-the-middle attack, impersonate the managed devices, and capture user credentials.

MitigationApply the Cisco patch when available; in the interim, avoid managing devices over untrusted networks and monitor for unusual SSH connection patterns.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Nexus DashboardApplication
Affected:< 3.2\(2f\)

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Nexus Dashboard version
    Access the Nexus Dashboard admin interface or use the 'show version' command via CLI to determine the current software version
    Affected if The version is lower than 3.2(2f)
  2. Confirm Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller is in use
    Verify that NDFC is deployed and actively managing network devices by checking the NDFC web UI or running 'feature ndfc' in the NX-OS CLI
    Affected if NDFC is managing devices and the software version is below 3.2(2f)
  3. Check if SSH management is enabled
    In the NDFC interface, navigate to Device Management settings or use 'show ssh server' to verify SSH is configured for device management
    Affected if SSH is enabled for managing fabric devices and the version is vulnerable
  4. Review SSH host key verification settings
    Examine the SSH client configuration on NDFC for strict host key checking options. Check if 'StrictHostKeyChecking' is set to 'yes' or 'ask' in /etc/ssh/ssh_config or the equivalent NDFC SSH configuration
    Affected if Strict host key validation is disabled or set to 'no'

The environment is affected if Cisco Nexus Dashboard with NDFC is running a version below 3.2(2f), SSH is used for device management, and strict host key validation is not enforced.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 3.2 or later
Fixed in 3.2
Interim mitigation

Apply the Cisco patch when available; in the interim, avoid managing devices over untrusted networks and monitor for unusual SSH connection patterns.

Recommended fix High confidence

Cisco Nexus Dashboard 3.2(2f) or later

  1. Back up current Nexus Dashboard configuration and data
  2. Download Cisco Nexus Dashboard version 3.2(2f) or later from Cisco
  3. Follow Cisco's standard upgrade procedure for Nexus Dashboard
  4. After upgrade, verify SSH host key validation is functioning properly
  5. Confirm managed devices can be reached and SSH connections are secure

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Nexus Dashboard Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
17.0 hours of engineering $3,000
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20163 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20163 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data