CVE-2025-20169
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the SNMP subsystem of Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to cause a DoS condition on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper error handling when parsing SNMP requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted SNMP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a DoS condition. This vulnerability affects SNMP versions 1, 2c, and 3. To exploit this vulnerability through SNMP v2c or earlier, the attacker must know a valid read-write or read-only SNMP community string for the affected system. To exploit this vulnerability through SNMP v3, the attacker must have valid SNMP user credentials for the affected system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in the SNMP subsystem of Cisco IOS and IOS XE Software allows an authenticated attacker to send a crafted SNMP request that triggers improper error handling, causing the device to reload unexpectedly and result in a denial of service. The vulnerability affects SNMP versions 1, 2c, and 3 and requires valid SNMP credentials (community string for v1/v2c or user credentials for v3).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.2\(1\)= 12.2\(1\)dx= 12.2\(1\)dx1= 12.2\(1\)m0= 12.2\(1\)mb1= 12.2\(1\)xd= 12.2\(1\)xd1= 12.2\(1\)xd2= 12.2\(1\)xd3= 12.2\(1\)xd4= 12.2\(1\)xe= 12.2\(1\)xe1all versions= 3.2.0se= 3.2.0sg= 3.2.1se= 3.2.1sg= 3.2.2se= 3.2.2sg= 3.2.3se= 3.2.3sg= 3.2.4sg= 3.2.5sg= 3.2.6sgCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if SNMP is enabledRun 'show snmp' or 'show running-config | include snmp' to view SNMP configuration statusAffected if SNMP is enabled (any community string or user configured)
-
Identify the Cisco OS versionRun 'show version' and note the displayed IOS or IOS XE version numberAffected if The version matches any of the affected versions listed (12.2 family branches or any IOS XE version)
-
Confirm SNMP configuration includes community strings or usersRun 'show running-config | include snmp' and look for 'snmp-server community' or 'snmp-server user' entriesAffected if At least one SNMP community string (v1/v2c) or SNMP user (v3) is configured
-
Verify the device can receive SNMP requestsCheck the configuration for any interface bindings or ACLs that permit SNMP traffic. Run 'show snmp' to see packet countersAffected if SNMP is enabled and the device has processed SNMP requests (counters incrementing)
A device is affected if it runs a vulnerable IOS or IOS XE version, has SNMP enabled with at least one configured community string or SNMPv3 user, and can receive SNMP requests from an attacker with valid credentials.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedDisable SNMP if not required, or restrict SNMP access via ACLs to trusted management stations. For SNMPv3, ensure authentication and encryption are enabled. Apply the Cisco patch when available.
Obtain the specific fixed release from Cisco Security Advisory CVE-2025-20169 on sec.cloudapps.cisco.com - Cisco issues specific fixed releases per platform and should be consulted for the exact version
- 1. Confirm the specific IOS/IOS XE version running on the device using 'show version'
- 2. Access the Cisco Security Advisory at sec.cloudapps.cisco.com for CVE-2025-20169 to obtain the exact fixed release for your specific platform
- 3. Download the appropriate fixed IOS or IOS XE software release from Cisco's download website
- 4. Review release notes for any migration considerations or prerequisites
- 5. Plan a maintenance window as the device will need to be reloaded after the upgrade
- 6. Back up the current device configuration
- 7. Upgrade the device using the appropriate method (USB, TFTP, HTTP, etc.)
- 8. After upgrade, verify SNMP functionality is working and the device is stable
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,832.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20169 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20169 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data