CVE-2025-20172
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the SNMP subsystem of Cisco IOS Software, Cisco IOS XE Software, and Cisco IOS XR Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to cause a DoS condition on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper error handling when parsing SNMP requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted SNMP request to an affected device. For Cisco IOS and IOS XE Software, a successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a DoS condition. For Cisco IOS XR Software, a successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the SNMP process to restart, resulting in an interrupted SNMP response from an affected device. Devices that are running Cisco IOS XR Software will not reload. This vulnerability affects SNMP versions 1, 2c, and 3. To exploit this vulnerability through SNMP v2c or earlier, the attacker must know a valid read-write or read-only SNMP community string for the affected system. To exploit this vulnerability through SNMP v3, the attacker must have valid SNMP user credentials for the affected system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA denial of service vulnerability exists in the SNMP subsystem of Cisco IOS, IOS XE, and IOS XR software due to improper error handling when parsing crafted SNMP requests. An authenticated attacker with valid SNMP credentials (community string for v1/v2c or user credentials for v3) can send a specially crafted SNMP request that causes affected devices to either reload unexpectedly (IOS/IOS XE) or restart the SNMP process (IOS XR), resulting in service disruption.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.2\(33\)sre= 12.2\(33\)sre0a= 12.2\(33\)sre1= 12.2\(33\)sre2= 12.2\(33\)sre3= 12.2\(33\)sre4= 12.2\(33\)sre5= 12.2\(33\)sre6= 12.2\(33\)sre7= 12.2\(33\)sre7a= 12.2\(33\)sre8= 12.2\(33\)sre9= 3.2.0se= 3.2.1se= 3.2.2se= 3.2.3se= 3.3.0se= 3.3.0sg= 3.3.1se= 3.3.1sg= 3.3.2se= 3.3.2sg= 3.3.3se= 3.3.4se= 7.0.1= 7.0.2= 7.0.12= 7.0.14= 7.1.1= 7.1.2= 7.1.3= 7.1.15= 7.2.0= 7.2.1= 7.2.2= 7.3.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device OS and versionRun 'show version' on the device CLI to obtain the exact software versionAffected if The version matches any of the listed affected versions for IOS, IOS XE, or IOS XR
-
Check if SNMP is enabledRun 'show snmp' or 'show snmp community' to see if SNMP is active and which versions are configuredAffected if SNMP is enabled (any version) on an affected version device
-
Determine SNMP configuration typeRun 'show running-config | include snmp' to see SNMP configuration lines, look for 'snmp-server community' (v1/v2c) or 'snmp-server user' (v3)Affected if SNMP v1 or v2c is configured (uses community strings without authentication)
-
Verify SNMP access controlRun 'show snmp group' or check ACLs applied to SNMP with 'show ip access-lists' and correlate with SNMP configurationAffected if SNMP is accessible from untrusted networks (no ACL restricting SNMP to management IPs)
A device is affected if it runs an affected IOS/IOS XE/IOS XR version AND has SNMP enabled, regardless of whether the attacker has valid credentials.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRestrict SNMP access via ACLs to trusted management networks, migrate to SNMPv3 with authentication and encryption, change any exposed community strings, and apply Cisco software updates when available.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20172 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20172 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data