CVE-2025-20209
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the Internet Key Exchange version 2 (IKEv2) function of Cisco IOS XR Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to prevent an affected device from processing any control plane UDP packets. This vulnerability is due to improper handling of malformed IKEv2 packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending malformed IKEv2 packets to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to prevent the affected device from processing any control plane UDP packets, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. Cisco has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in Cisco IOS XR Software's IKEv2 function allows unauthenticated remote attackers to cause denial of service by sending malformed IKEv2 packets, preventing the affected device from processing any control plane UDP packets.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.5.1= 6.5.2= 6.5.3= 6.6.1= 6.6.2= 6.6.3= 6.6.25= 7.0.0= 7.0.1= 7.0.2= 7.1.1= 7.1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm the device runs Cisco IOS XRLog into the device CLI and run 'show version' to identify the operating system. Look for 'IOS XR' in the output.Affected if The device is not running Cisco IOS XR (the vulnerability only applies to IOS XR)
-
Determine the installed IOS XR versionRun 'show version' and locate the version number in the output (for example, 7.1.2, 6.6.3)Affected if The installed version matches any of: 6.5.1, 6.5.2, 6.5.3, 6.6.1, 6.6.2, 6.6.3, 6.6.25, 7.0.0, 7.0.1, 7.0.2, 7.1.1, or 7.1.2
-
Verify IKEv2 is configured on the deviceRun 'show crypto ikev2 sa' or 'show crypto ikev2 session' to check for active IKEv2 security associations or sessionsAffected if IKEv2 is actively configured or has active security associations, meaning the device can receive IKEv2 packets on UDP port 500 or 4500
-
Confirm control plane UDP processing is impactedAfter receiving malformed IKEv2 packets, run 'show udp engines' or test control plane connectivity. The vulnerability prevents the device from processing any control plane UDP packets.Affected if The device stops processing control plane UDP traffic after receiving malformed IKEv2 packets
You are affected if your device runs Cisco IOS XR version 6.5.1 through 7.1.2 and has IKEv2 enabled, allowing malformed IKEv2 packets to cause denial of service on control plane UDP processing.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the Cisco software update that addresses this vulnerability; there are no available workarounds.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20209 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20209 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data