CVE-2025-20225
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the Internet Key Exchange Version 2 (IKEv2) feature of Cisco IOS Software, IOS XE Software, Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software, and Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to trigger a memory leak, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. This vulnerability is due to a lack of proper processing of IKEv2 packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted IKEv2 packets to an affected device. In the case of Cisco IOS and IOS XE Software, a successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device to reload unexpectedly. In the case of Cisco ASA and FTD Software, a successful exploit could allow the attacker to partially exhaust system memory, causing system instability such as being unable to establish new IKEv2 VPN sessions. A manual reboot of the device is required to recover from this condition.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA memory leak vulnerability exists in the IKEv2 feature of Cisco IOS, IOS XE, ASA, and FTD software due to improper processing of crafted IKEv2 packets. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send specially constructed IKEv2 packets to trigger memory exhaustion, causing device reload on IOS/IOS XE or memory exhaustion preventing new IKEv2 VPN sessions on ASA/FTD.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Cisco product and versionUse 'show version' command (IOS/IOS XE) or check the ASA/FTD system inventory to confirm the product name and exact software versionAffected if Running any Cisco IOS, IOS XE, ASA, or FTD software version without the fixed patch applied to CVE-2025-20225
-
Verify IKEv2 is configuredCheck the running configuration for 'crypto ikev2' commands or use 'show crypto ikev2 sa' to see active IKEv2 security associationsAffected if IKEv2 is enabled and the device is accepting IKEv2 connections
-
Confirm IKEv2 is exposed to untrusted networksReview interface ACLs and VPN tunnel termination interfaces to determine if UDP port 500/4500 (IKEv2) is reachable from outside trusted networksAffected if IKEv2 ports are open to the internet or untrusted network segments
-
Check for memory exhaustion symptomsUse 'show memory' (IOS/IOS XE/ASA) or 'show system resource' (FTD) to monitor available memory; review logs for unexpected device reloads or VPN session failuresAffected if Device is experiencing abnormal memory consumption, frequent reloads, or inability to establish new IKEv2 VPN sessions
A user is affected if they run any vulnerable Cisco IOS, IOS XE, ASA, or FTD version with IKEv2 enabled and exposed to untrusted networks, and are experiencing memory issues or device reloads.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Cisco security patches for CVE-2025-20225 when available; restrict IKEv2 exposure to trusted networks via ACLs or disable IKEv2 if not required; monitor device memory and establish alerting for abnormal consumption.
Refer to Cisco advisory for product-specific fixed versions (IOS, IOS XE, ASA, or FTD)
- Locate the Cisco security advisory for CVE-2025-20225 on the Cisco Security Advisories portal (sec.cloudapps.cisco.com)
- Identify your specific device model and current software version using 'show version' command
- Consult the 'Fixed Releases' section of the advisory to determine the exact version required for your product line (IOS, IOS XE, ASA, or FTD)
- Download the appropriate fixed software release from Cisco's Software Download center
- Plan a maintenance window as the fix requires a software upgrade
- Before upgrading, back up your current configuration
- Upgrade the device to the fixed software release
- After upgrade, verify the device is functioning correctly and monitor memory usage
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20225 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20225 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data