CVE-2025-20234
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in Universal Disk Format (UDF) processing of ClamAV could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to a memory overread during UDF file scanning. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by submitting a crafted file containing UDF content to be scanned by ClamAV on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to terminate the ClamAV scanning process, resulting in a DoS condition on the affected software. For a description of this vulnerability, see the .
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceClamAV contains a memory overread vulnerability in its Universal Disk Format (UDF) file parsing code. When scanning a specially crafted UDF file, the scanner reads beyond allocated memory boundaries, causing the scanning process to crash and terminate, resulting in denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.26.1< 7.5.21>= 8.0.1.21160, < 8.4.5< 4.2.2>= 1.2.0, < 1.4.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed ClamAV versionRun 'clamd --version' or check the package manager for the installed ClamAV versionAffected if The installed version is >= 1.2.0 and < 1.4.3 for ClamAV, or falls within the affected Cisco Secure Endpoint version ranges
-
Identify if UDF scanning is enabledInspect the ClamAV configuration files (clamd.conf, freshclam.conf) for 'scanudf' or UDF-related directivesAffected if UDF scanning is enabled in the configuration
-
Verify UDF file handling in scanning workflowsReview scanning logs or policies to determine if UDF files are processed during antivirus scansAffected if UDF files are being scanned or processed by the ClamAV engine
A user is affected if they run a vulnerable ClamAV version AND have UDF scanning enabled, and process UDF files through the scanner.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.4.31.26.14.2.2
Update ClamAV to the version containing the fix for CVE-2025-20234. If immediate patching is not possible, consider disabling UDF scanning or implementing file-type based pre-filtering to reject UDF files at the perimeter until the update can be applied.
ClamAV: 1.4.3+ | Secure Endpoint: 1.26.1+, 7.5.21+, or 8.4.5+ | Secure Endpoint Private Cloud: 4.2.2+
- 1. Identify the specific ClamAV or Cisco Secure Endpoint product and version currently installed
- 2. For ClamAV: Upgrade to version 1.4.3 or later
- 3. For Secure Endpoint: Upgrade to version 1.26.1 or later (for older release tracks)
- 4. For Secure Endpoint: Upgrade to version 7.5.21 or later (for 7.x release track)
- 5. For Secure Endpoint: Upgrade to version 8.4.5 or later (for 8.x release track, minimum 8.0.1.21160)
- 6. For Secure Endpoint Private Cloud: Upgrade to version 4.2.2 or later
- 7. After upgrading, verify the new version is running and re-scan any previously quarantined files if needed
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20234 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20234 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data