CVE-2025-20257
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in an API subsystem of Cisco Secure Network Analytics Manager and Cisco Secure Network Analytics Virtual Manager could allow an authenticated, remote attacker with low privileges to generate fraudulent findings that are used to generate alarms and alerts on an affected product. Thi vulnerability is due to insufficient authorization enforcement on a specific API. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by authenticating as a low-privileged user and performing API calls with crafted input. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obfuscate legitimate findings in analytics reports or create false indications with alarms and alerts on an affected device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an API authorization bypass vulnerability in Cisco Secure Network Analytics where low-privileged users can manipulate the API to create fraudulent security findings, obfuscate legitimate data, or trigger false alarms and alerts. The root cause is insufficient authorization enforcement on specific API endpoints, allowing authenticated users to perform actions beyond their privilege level.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.5.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Cisco Secure Network Analytics versionRun 'show version' from the appliance CLI or check the web UI under Administration > System > AboutAffected if The installed version is exactly 7.5.2
-
Confirm API access is enabledCheck the API configuration in the web UI under Administration > Integration > API Settings, or review if API endpoints are accessible on port 443Affected if API access is enabled and exposed
-
Review user role assignmentsCheck user accounts and their assigned roles under Administration > Users in the web UI. Identify accounts with 'Analyst', 'Operator', or non-admin rolesAffected if Low-privileged users (non-admin) exist and have API access credentials
-
Audit API activity logsReview API access logs under Monitoring > Logs > API Logs, looking for API calls from low-privileged users that modify findings, alerts, or sensor configurationsAffected if API activity from low-privileged users includes POST, PUT, or DELETE operations on findings/alerts
You are affected if Cisco Secure Network Analytics version 7.5.2 is installed, the API is enabled, and low-privileged users have API access capabilities.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor patch when available. In the interim, monitor API activity logs for unusual patterns from low-privileged accounts and consider restricting API access to trusted users or networks.
Upgrade to the latest stable release of Cisco Secure Network Analytics (latest 7.x release or later)
- 1. Log in to the Secure Network Analytics Manager or Virtual Manager console
- 2. Navigate to the Administration or System Settings section
- 3. Check the current software version to confirm it is 7.5.2
- 4. Download the latest available Cisco Secure Network Analytics release from Cisco.com or your authorized Cisco distributor
- 5. Follow the Cisco Secure Network Analytics upgrade documentation to install the fixed release
- 6. After upgrade, verify the new version is running and confirm the vulnerability is addressed
- 7. Test that low-privileged user accounts can no longer create fraudulent findings via the API
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20257 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20257 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data