NULL Pointer DereferenceWeakness · CWE-476

CVE-2025-20262

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-08-27
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
56/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the Protocol Independent Multicast Version 6 (PIM6) feature of Cisco Nexus 3000 Series Switches and Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switches in standalone NX-OS mode could allow an authenticated, low-privileged, remote attacker to trigger a crash of the PIM6 process, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. This vulnerability is due to improper processing of PIM6 ephemeral data queries. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted ephemeral query to an affected device through one of the following methods: NX-API REST, NETCONF, RESTConf, gRPC, or Model Driven Telemetry. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the PIM6 process to crash and restart, causing potential adjacency flaps and resulting in a DoS of the PIM6 and ephemeral query processes.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A vulnerability in the PIM6 feature of Cisco Nexus 3000/9000 Series switches allows an authenticated low-privileged remote attacker to crash the PIM6 process by sending crafted ephemeral data queries via management APIs (NX-API REST, NETCONF, RESTConf, gRPC, or Model Driven Telemetry), causing process restarts and denial of service.

MitigationApply the Cisco patch for this vulnerability when available; until then, restrict management API access to trusted users only and monitor for PIM6 process instability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the Nexus switch model
    Run 'show version' or check the device model to confirm it is a Nexus 3000 or 9000 Series switch
    Affected if The device is not a Nexus 3000 or 9000 Series switch
  2. Check the installed software version
    Run 'show version' and compare the NX-OS version against the affected version range provided in Cisco's advisory for this CVE
    Affected if The installed NX-OS version falls within the affected range and has not been patched
  3. Verify if PIM6 is enabled
    Run 'show ip pim vrf all' or 'show running-config | include pim' to check if PIM6 (IPv6 PIM) is configured and active on any VRF
    Affected if PIM6 is enabled and running on the switch
  4. Confirm management API accessibility
    Check if any of NX-API REST, NETCONF, RESTConf, gRPC, or Model Driven Telemetry are enabled by running 'show feature' or reviewing management interface configurations
    Affected if Management APIs are accessible (even from a restricted management network)
  5. Look for PIM6 process instability
    Review 'show system internal process crashinfo' or check logs for recent PIM6 process crashes or restarts, and run 'show process cpu | include pim6d' to check current process health
    Affected if The PIM6 process has recently crashed or is experiencing unexpected restarts

The environment is affected if the device is a Nexus 3000/9000 Series switch running a vulnerable NX-OS version with PIM6 enabled and management APIs accessible, particularly if PIM6 process instability is observed.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the Cisco patch for this vulnerability when available; until then, restrict management API access to trusted users only and monitor for PIM6 process instability.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20262 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20262 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data