CVE-2025-20274
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Intelligence Center could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to upload arbitrary files to an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper validation of files that are uploaded to the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by uploading arbitrary files to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to store malicious files on the system and execute arbitrary commands on the operating system. The Security Impact Rating (SIR) of this advisory has been raised to High because an attacker could elevate privileges to root. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid credentials for a user account with at least the role of Report Designer.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an arbitrary file upload vulnerability in Cisco Unified Intelligence Center's web-based management interface. The lack of proper validation on uploaded files allows an authenticated attacker with at least Report Designer role to upload malicious files and execute arbitrary operating system commands with root privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.5\(1\)= 11.0\(1\)= 11.0\(2\)= 11.0\(3\)= 11.5\(1\)= 11.6\(1\)= 12.0\(1\)= 12.5\(1\)= 12.5\(1\)su= 12.6\(1\)= 12.6\(1\)_es05_et= 12.6\(1\)_et= 10.5\(1\)= 10.5\(1\)su1= 10.5\(1\)su1es10= 10.6\(1\)= 10.6\(1\)su1= 10.6\(1\)su2= 10.6\(1\)su2es04= 10.6\(1\)su3= 10.6\(1\)su3es01= 10.6\(1\)su3es02= 10.6\(1\)su3es03= 11.0\(1\)su1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cisco Unified Intelligence Center or UCCX installationLocate the Cisco Unified Intelligence Center or Unified Contact Center Express installation directory or check system inventory for these productsAffected if Either product is installed on the system
-
Check installed version against affected rangesUse the product's CLI or admin interface to retrieve the exact version number (e.g., show version command or web UI about page)Affected if The installed version matches any of: CUIC 10.5(1), 11.0(1), 11.0(2), 11.0(3), 11.5(1), 11.6(1), 12.0(1), 12.5(1), 12.5(1)su, 12.6(1), 12.6(1)_es05_et, 12.6(1)_et; or UCCX 10.5(1), 10.5(1)su1, 10.5(1)su1es10, 10.6(1), 10.6(1)su1, 10.6(1)su2, 10.6(1)su2es04, 10.6(1)su3, 10.6(1)su3es01, 10.6(1)su3es02
-
Verify web-based management interface is accessibleConfirm the Cisco Unified Intelligence Center web interface (typically on port 443/8443) is reachable from networkAffected if The web management interface is exposed and accessible
-
Audit accounts with Report Designer roleReview user accounts in the Cisco Unified Intelligence Center admin console to identify users assigned the Report Designer roleAffected if Any user account has Report Designer privileges, especially if multiple users share this role
-
Inspect recent file uploads via web interfaceCheck server logs or the uploads directory for unexpected or suspicious file types uploaded through the Report Designer featureAffected if Unexpected executable files, scripts, or unusual file types appear in upload logs or directories
The environment is affected if Cisco Unified Intelligence Center or UCCX is installed with an affected version AND the web-based management interface is accessible with users having Report Designer role privileges.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the Cisco patch when available; until then, restrict access to the web-based management interface and limit user accounts to minimum necessary privileges, monitoring for suspicious file uploads.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20274 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20274 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data