OS Command InjectionWeakness · CWE-78

CVE-2025-20294

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-08-27
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Multiple vulnerabilities in the CLI and web-based management interface of Cisco UCS Manager Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker with administrative privileges to perform command injection attacks on an affected system and elevate privileges to root.   These vulnerabilities are due to insufficient input validation of command arguments supplied by the user. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by authenticating to a device and submitting crafted input to the affected commands. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system of the affected device with root-level privileges.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Cisco UCS Manager Software contains multiple command injection vulnerabilities in its CLI and web-based management interface. An authenticated attacker with administrative privileges can submit crafted input to affected commands, bypassing input validation and executing arbitrary operating system commands with root-level privileges.

MitigationApply Cisco's vendor patches for UCS Manager when released, and restrict administrative access to trusted personnel only while monitoring for suspicious command activity.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Cisco UCS Manager installation
    Check if Cisco UCS Manager software is installed or running in your environment. Look for UCS Manager processes, services, or the associated management IP/hostname in your network inventory.
    Affected if UCS Manager software is present in the environment
  2. Determine UCS Manager version
    Access the UCS Manager CLI via console or SSH and run the 'show version' command to obtain the installed version number. Compare this against any affected version ranges provided by Cisco advisories.
    Affected if The installed version falls within affected version ranges (version comparison required)
  3. Verify web management interface exposure
    Check if the UCS Manager web-based management interface (HTTPS port 443 or configured web port) is accessible from network locations. Review firewall rules and access lists controlling access to UCS Manager web interfaces.
    Affected if Web management interface is exposed to network where untrusted users could potentially authenticate
  4. Confirm administrative account existence
    Review UCS Manager user accounts with administrative or privileged access using 'show admin-session' or user accounting logs. Identify accounts with administrator-level privileges.
    Affected if Administrative accounts exist in UCS Manager (required condition for exploitation)
  5. Audit recent administrative sessions and commands
    Review UCS Manager logs, accounting records, or command history for suspicious or unexpected CLI commands, especially those showing abnormal patterns or originating from unexpected sources.
    Affected if Suspicious administrative command activity is observed in logs

Environment is affected if Cisco UCS Manager software is running and the version matches affected ranges, combined with accessible administrative interfaces or accounts.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply Cisco's vendor patches for UCS Manager when released, and restrict administrative access to trusted personnel only while monitoring for suspicious command activity.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,130
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20294 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20294 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data