Open RedirectWeakness · CWE-601

CVE-2025-20317

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-08-27
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the Virtual Keyboard Video Monitor (vKVM) connection handling of Cisco Integrated Management Controller (IMC) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to redirect a user to a malicious website. This vulnerability is due to insufficient verification of vKVM endpoints. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to click a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to redirect a user to a malicious webpage and potentially capture user credentials. Note: The affected vKVM client is also included in Cisco UCS Manager.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

An open redirect vulnerability in Cisco IMC's vKVM component allows unauthenticated attackers to craft malicious links that redirect users to arbitrary websites due to insufficient validation of vKVM endpoints. The attacker must persuade a user to click the crafted link, potentially leading to credential theft via phishing.

MitigationApply Cisco-provided patches for IMC and UCS Manager when available; alternatively, disable vKVM if not required and educate users about avoiding suspicious links.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Cisco IMC installation
    Access the BMC/IPMI web interface or check the system for Cisco IMC by navigating to the management IP or checking for the IMC web server port (usually 443/80). Use the command 'ipmitool -I open lan print' or check BMC credentials to confirm IMC presence.
    Affected if Cisco IMC is present and accessible on the network
  2. Determine Cisco IMC version
    Log into the Cisco IMC web UI and navigate to the Admin tab > Summary page, or use the CLI command 'show version' via IPMI/ssh to the IMC. Locate the firmware/software version number.
    Affected if The installed IMC version falls within any affected version range (compare to Cisco's official advisory)
  3. Verify vKVM feature is enabled
    In the Cisco IMC web interface, go to Virtual KVM or vKVM settings (typically under Server > Remote Management > vKVM). Check if the Virtual KVM and/or Virtual Media features are currently enabled.
    Affected if vKVM is enabled and accessible without additional authentication layers
  4. Inspect vKVM URL parameters for redirect behavior
    Access the vKVM interface via the browser. Observe the URL when clicking any redirect or navigation links within the vKVM console. Look for 'redirect' or 'url' parameters in the vKVM endpoint URLs.
    Affected if The vKVM endpoints accept arbitrary URL parameters that could cause redirection to external sites
  5. Check vKVM access controls
    Review the IMC user roles and permissions associated with vKVM access. Determine if unauthenticated or low-privilege users can access vKVM endpoints.
    Affected if vKVM is accessible to unauthenticated users or users without proper network segmentation

A system is affected if it runs Cisco IMC with an unpatched version and has vKVM enabled, allowing crafted links to redirect users to external sites.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply Cisco-provided patches for IMC and UCS Manager when available; alternatively, disable vKVM if not required and educate users about avoiding suspicious links.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20317 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20317 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data