CVE-2025-20337
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in a specific API of Cisco ISE and Cisco ISE-PIC could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the underlying operating system as root. The attacker does not require any valid credentials to exploit this vulnerability. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by submitting a crafted API request. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain root privileges on an affected device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a command injection vulnerability in a specific API endpoint of Cisco ISE and Cisco ISE-PIC where insufficient input validation allows an unauthenticated attacker to submit crafted API requests that execute arbitrary code with root privileges on the underlying operating system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.3.0= 3.4.0= 3.3.0= 3.4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Cisco ISE versionLog into the Cisco ISE admin UI or use the CLI command 'show version' to determine the installed version. Alternatively, check via the API using 'GET https://<ise-host>/admin/API/mnt/version'.Affected if The installed version is exactly 3.3.0 or exactly 3.4.0.
-
Check Cisco ISE-PIC versionLog into the Cisco ISE-PIC admin UI or use the CLI command 'show version' to determine the installed version of the Passive Identity Connector.Affected if The installed version is exactly 3.3.0 or exactly 3.4.0.
-
Identify exposed management interfacesReview network firewall rules and access lists to determine which management interfaces (HTTP/HTTPS admin ports, API ports) are exposed to untrusted networks. Use 'show run' on network devices or check cloud security groups if applicable.Affected if TCP ports 443 (HTTPS) or 80 (HTTP) for the ISE admin or API interfaces are accessible from untrusted/unmanaged networks.
-
Check for unauthorized API access attemptsReview Cisco ISE logs under Operations > Reports > RADIUS Live Logs and system logs for suspicious API requests, especially from unknown IP addresses. Look for abnormal API call patterns or authentication failures.Affected if There are API requests from unknown sources, especially failed authentication attempts preceding successful unauthorized access.
-
Verify API service statusIn Cisco ISE, navigate to Administration > System > Settings > API Settings and review which API services are enabled. Check if the internal REST API service is running.Affected if The internal REST API service is enabled and accessible without authentication from network perspective.
You are affected if Cisco ISE or ISE-PIC is running version 3.3.0 or 3.4.0 AND the management/API interfaces are accessible from untrusted networks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Cisco's available security patch for this vulnerability; if patches are unavailable, consider network segmentation to limit exposure to untrusted networks and implement additional authentication controls at network perimeter devices.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20337 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20337 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data