CVE-2025-20354
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the Java Remote Method Invocation (RMI) process of Cisco Unified CCX could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to upload arbitrary files and execute arbitrary commands with root permissions on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to improper authentication mechanisms that are associated to specific Cisco Unified CCX features. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by uploading a crafted file to an affected system through the Java RMI process. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system and elevate privileges to root.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a critical authentication bypass vulnerability in the Java RMI (Remote Method Invocation) process of Cisco Unified CCX. An unauthenticated remote attacker can upload crafted files through the Java RMI interface due to improper authentication mechanisms, enabling execution of arbitrary commands with root privileges on the underlying operating system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 12.5\(1\)_su03_es07= 15.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cisco Unified CCX versionRun 'show version' or access the Cisco Unified CCX admin interface to determine the exact installed version. Compare against the affected ranges: < 12.5(1)_su03_es07 or = 15.0Affected if Installed version is 15.0 or is earlier than 12.5(1)_su03_es07
-
Verify Java RMI service statusCheck if the Java RMI service is running on the Cisco Unified CCX system. This is typically enabled by default for the Cisco Unified CCX engine. Use 'show process list' or check service status via the Cisco Unified Serviceability interfaceAffected if Java RMI service (Engine) is running and enabled on the system
-
Confirm network exposure of RMI portsReview firewall rules and network access lists to determine if the Java RMI ports (typically port 2099 or range 50000-51000 for CTI/RMI services) are accessible from untrusted networks. Use 'show network access' or review IP access listsAffected if RMI ports are exposed to untrusted networks or the internet without proper ACL restrictions
-
Inspect for suspicious RMI trafficCapture and analyze network traffic on RMI ports for unexpected incoming connections or unusual method invocations. Check Cisco Unified CCX logs under /var/log/active/ for RMI-related entries and authentication failuresAffected if Unexpected RMI connections are observed or unauthenticated RMI calls are logged
A system is affected if it runs Cisco Unified CCX version 15.0 or any version earlier than 12.5(1)_su03_es07, has Java RMI enabled, and has the RMI interface network-accessible to untrusted attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped12.5
Apply the vendor-provided security patch for CVE-2025-20354 from Cisco immediately. Until patched, restrict network access to Cisco Unified CCX systems and monitor for suspicious RMI traffic.
12.5(1)_su03_es07 or later for 12.x branch; next maintenance release after 15.0 for 15.x branch
- Identify the current installed version of Cisco Unified Contact Center Express (CCX) using the system administration interface or CLI
- For systems running version 12.5(1) versions before SU3 ES07: Plan upgrade to version 12.5(1)_su03_es07 or later
- For systems running version 15.0: Plan upgrade to the next available maintenance release after 15.0 (contact Cisco TAC for specific fixed release)
- Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade process
- Back up the current system configuration following Cisco backup procedures
- Download the appropriate software update from Cisco (requires valid service contract)
- Apply the upgrade following Cisco Unified CCX upgrade documentation
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version in the Cisco Unified CCX Serviceability page
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20354 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20354 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data