CVE-2025-20645
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn KeyInstall, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS09475476; Issue ID: MSV-2599.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAn out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in KeyInstall due to a missing bounds check. A malicious actor with existing System privilege can exploit this to potentially gain higher privileges. The vulnerability stems from insufficient input validation in the KeyInstall component, which handles cryptographic key installation or storage.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 14.0= 15.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Android versionGo to Settings > About Phone > Android version, or run 'getprop ro.build.version.release' via ADB shellAffected if Version is exactly 14.0 or 15.0
-
Verify KeyInstall component presenceCheck for the presence of KeyInstall service by examining system logs or running 'dumpsys' commands related to key management servicesAffected if KeyInstall component is present and exposed on the device
-
Assess system privilege accessReview which applications or processes hold System-level privileges using 'dumpsys package' or system permission auditsAffected if Multiple or unchecked processes hold System privilege, increasing exploitability
-
Check for unauthorized system process accessMonitor logcat or security audit logs for unusual access attempts to KeyInstall or cryptographic key installation interfacesAffected if Any unauthorized or unexpected processes are accessing KeyInstall-related system calls
If the device runs Android 14.0 or 15.0 and the KeyInstall component is present and accessible, the environment may be affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply patch ALPS09475476 to address the missing bounds check in KeyInstall. Since this requires System privilege to exploit, ensure strict access controls on the affected component and monitor for any unauthorized access to System-level processes.
Apply the latest Android security update from your device manufacturer that includes the MediaTek patch (ALPS09475476). Check device manufacturer support pages or carrier updates for the specific Android security patch level that contains this fix.
- 1. Check the current Android security patch level on the device (Settings > About Phone > Android version or Security patch level)
- 2. Verify if the installed security patch level is dated after the CVE was addressed in MediaTek's monthly security bulletin
- 3. If the device has not received the fix, check for a system software update from the device manufacturer
- 4. Apply any available system updates - MediaTek chipset fixes like this (Patch ID: ALPS09475476) are delivered through device manufacturer firmware updates
- 5. After updating, confirm the security patch level reflects the fix date (typically included in Android's monthly security bulletin that addressed this CVE)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing24.0 h
- Review / QA12.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $16,384.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20645 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20645 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data