CVE-2025-20696
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn DA, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege, if an attacker has physical access to the device, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS09915215; Issue ID: MSV-3801.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOut-of-bounds write vulnerability in Device Administration (DA) component due to missing bounds check. Allows local privilege escalation with physical access to the device and user interaction required for exploitation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.0= 2024q1= 13.0= 14.0= 15.0= 21.02.0= 23.05= 3.7.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Physical
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the product and version in useDetermine which of the affected products is running: Linux Foundation Yocto 4.0, RDKcentral RDK B 2024q1, Google Android 13.0/14.0/15.0, OpenWRT 21.02.0/23.05, or Zephyrproject Zephyr 3.7.0. Use system queries (e.g., 'cat /etc/os-release' for Linux-based, 'getprop' for Android, 'cat /etc/version' for OpenWRT) to retrieve the exact version string.Affected if The installed version matches 4.0 for Yocto, 2024q1 for RDK B, 13.0/14.0/15.0 for Android, 21.02.0/23.05 for OpenWRT, or 3.7.0 for Zephyr
-
Verify Device Administration component is enabledLocate and inspect the Device Administration (DA) component configuration. On Android, check 'adb shell pm list features' or look for 'device_admin' entries in /data/system/users/0/*.xml. On Linux-based systems, search for DA-related processes or services (e.g., 'ps aux | grep -i admin' or 'systemctl list-units | grep -i admin'). For embedded devices, review the firmware configuration for DA module inclusion.Affected if The Device Administration component is present and active on the system
-
Check for specific DA component files and configurationsExamine the DA component for the affected binary or library. On Android, look in /system/bin/ or /system/lib/ for DA-related executables. On Linux/OpenWRT, check /usr/sbin/ or /opt/. For Zephyr, review the built firmware image for DA module presence. Identify the binary responsible for Device Administration functionality.Affected if The DA binary/library exists in the expected system path and matches the vulnerable component
-
Confirm physical access scenario appliesReview the deployment context: determine if the device is physically accessible to untrusted users in a manner that would enable an attacker with physical access to interact with the Device Administration feature. This includes checking if the device is in a shared or public location, or if console/USB access is available to non-admin users.Affected if The device can be physically accessed by untrusted individuals who could trigger user interaction with the DA component
A system is affected if it runs one of the specified versions (Yocto 4.0, RDK B 2024q1, Android 13.0/14.0/15.0, OpenWRT 21.02.0/23.05, Zephyr 3.7.0) and has the Device Administration component enabled and accessible to an attacker with physical access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor patch ALPS09915215 via firmware update. Physical access requirement limits attack surface but patch deployment is necessary for complete remediation.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20696 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20696 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data