CVE-2025-2071
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA critical OS Command Injection vulnerability has been identified in the FAST LTA Silent Brick WebUI, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands via specially crafted input. This vulnerability arises due to improper handling of untrusted input, which is passed directly to system-level commands without adequate sanitization or validation. Successful exploitation could allow attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the affected system, potentially resulting in unauthorized access, data leakage, or full system compromise. Affected WebUI parameters are "hd" and "pi".
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOS Command Injection vulnerability in FAST LTA Silent Brick WebUI allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands through the 'hd' and 'pi' parameters. User input is passed directly to system-level commands without sanitization or validation, enabling complete system compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- P
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:P/AU:N/R:X/V:X/RE:M/U:Amber
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm FAST LTA Silent Brick WebUI is runningAccess the web interface via browser on the expected IP/hostname (default port 80/443) or use a network scanner to detect open HTTP/HTTPS services on the deviceAffected if The WebUI is accessible and responds to HTTP requests
-
Identify the Silent Brick software versionLog into the WebUI and look for a version number in the UI footer, About page, or system settings; alternatively, check the installed software package on the system if you have direct accessAffected if The installed version matches the vulnerable version range (check vendor advisories for exact vulnerable versions)
-
Verify the WebUI exposes the affected parametersExamine the HTML forms or API endpoints in the WebUI for input fields named 'hd' or 'pi', or attempt to access common web paths that may expose these parametersAffected if The parameters 'hd' or 'pi' are present in the web application's forms or URL parameters
-
Check authentication configuration on the WebUIReview the WebUI's authentication settings to determine if the affected endpoints require authentication, or test if unauthenticated requests to the affected parameters are acceptedAffected if The affected parameters can be reached without proper authentication or with weak authentication controls
-
Confirm network accessibility of the WebUIDetermine if the WebUI is exposed to the network (including internal networks) by reviewing firewall rules, NAT configurations, or network segmentation policiesAffected if The WebUI is reachable from network segments where untrusted users or systems can access it
A user is affected if they run a vulnerable version of FAST LTA Silent Brick WebUI with the WebUI accessible on the network and the 'hd' or 'pi' parameters exposed without proper input sanitization or authentication controls.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-provided patch when available; until then, restrict network access to the WebUI interface and implement input validation/sanitization on affected parameters to prevent command injection.
- Consultation16.0 h
- Implementation32.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $20,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-2071 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-2071 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data