CVE-2025-20720
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn wlan AP driver, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: WCNCR00418954; Issue ID: MSV-3569.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOut-of-bounds write vulnerability in WLAN AP driver due to incorrect bounds checking. A proximal/adjacent attacker within wireless range can exploit this to achieve privilege escalation without any user interaction or additional execution privileges needed.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 7.6.7.2= 19.07.0= 21.02.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the system typeDetermine if the device runs Mediatek Software Development Kit or OpenWrt firmwareAffected if System is neither Mediatek SDK nor OpenWrt, the check does not apply
-
Check Mediatek SDK versionLocate the SDK version file or execute version command for Mediatek Software Development Kit; compare the installed version to <= 7.6.7.2Affected if Mediatek SDK version is 7.6.7.2 or lower
-
Check OpenWrt versionCheck the installed OpenWrt version; compare to affected versions 19.07.0 and 21.02.0Affected if OpenWrt version is exactly 19.07.0 or 21.02.0
-
Verify WLAN AP driver is activeInspect loaded kernel modules or running processes related to wireless AP functionality; confirm the WLAN AP driver is loaded and operatingAffected if WLAN AP driver is not loaded or disabled - the vulnerability cannot be exploited in this state
-
Confirm wireless interface is enabledCheck wireless network interface status; look for active AP-mode interfaces using iwconfig, ip link, or similar toolsAffected if No wireless interfaces are configured in AP mode - exploitation requires active AP functionality
System is affected if it runs Mediatek SDK <= 7.6.7.2 OR OpenWrt 19.07.0/21.02.0 AND has the WLAN AP driver loaded with an active access point interface
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor patch WCNCR00418954 to fix the incorrect bounds check in the WLAN AP driver. Prioritize patching in production wireless infrastructure.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20720 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20720 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data