CVE-2025-20721
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn imgsensor, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10089545; Issue ID: MSV-4279.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA missing bounds check in the imgsensor driver (camera image sensor) allows an out-of-bounds write vulnerability. An attacker with existing System privilege can exploit this to escalate to higher privileges (likely root) without user interaction. The vulnerability exists in the kernel/driver space of mobile device firmware.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 25.0= 13.0= 14.0= 15.0= 16.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Android OS versionGo to Settings > About Phone > Android version, or run 'getprop ro.build.version.release' via ADB shellAffected if The version matches 13.0, 14.0, 15.0, or 16.0 exactly (note: this CVE may affect specific sub-versions within these releases; compare your exact build to vendor security bulletins)
-
Check Mediatek firmware version on IoT devicesOn Mediatek Iot Yocto devices, check the firmware version via 'cat /etc/version' or 'uname -a' output, or check 'getprop ro.build.version.incremental'Affected if The firmware version equals 25.0 exactly (compare against Mediatek's official security advisory for this CVE)
-
Verify imgsensor driver is loadedRun 'lsmod | grep imgsensor' or check /sys/module/ directory for imgsensor module presence via 'ls /sys/module/ | grep imgsensor'Affected if The imgsensor kernel module is present and loaded (the vulnerability only affects devices with this driver enabled)
-
Check security patch levelRun 'getprop ro.build.version.security_patch' via ADB shell, or check Settings > About Phone > Security patch levelAffected if The security patch level is earlier than the vendor patch ALPS10089545 release date (patch level below the month the fix was shipped)
-
Check kernel version and buildRun 'uname -a' and 'cat /proc/version' to identify the kernel build; for Mediatek devices also check 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' for SoC detailsAffected if The running kernel is from the affected Android versions without the bounds check patch applied to the imgsensor driver code
A defender is affected if they run Android 13.0-16.0 or Mediatek Iot Yocto 25.0, have the imgsensor driver loaded, and are on a security patch level predating the ALPS10089545 fix.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor patch ALPS10089545 to the imgsensor driver. This is a firmware-level update requiring careful testing to ensure camera sensor functionality remains intact after the bounds check is added.
- Contact MediaTek or your device manufacturer to obtain the security patch ALPS10089545 which addresses this vulnerability
- Apply the patch through the device manufacturer's standard OTA (Over-The-Air) update mechanism or firmware update process
- Verify the patch has been applied by checking the system security patch level in Settings > About Phone > Software Information > Security Patch Level
- Ensure the device is running the latest available security update from your device manufacturer
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20721 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20721 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data