CVE-2025-20734
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn wlan AP driver, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: WCNCR00441507; Issue ID: MSV-4112.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA bounds check error in the WLAN AP driver causes an out-of-bounds write vulnerability. An attacker with System-level privileges can exploit this to further escalate privileges locally. The vulnerability stems from incorrect validation of array indices or buffer boundaries in the driver's memory handling code.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 7.6.7.2= 19.07.0= 21.02.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Mediatek WLAN hardware in useCheck system hardware info or network interfaces for Mediatek wireless adapters (e.g., via lspci, lsusb, or /proc/bus/pci)Affected if The system uses Mediatek wireless hardware and the WLAN AP driver is loaded
-
Check Mediatek SDK versionIf using Mediatek SDK, locate and inspect the SDK version file or kernel module version (typically in /etc or embedded in driver module info)Affected if The SDK version is 7.6.7.2 or earlier
-
Check OpenWrt versionOn OpenWrt systems, run 'cat /etc/openwrt_release' or 'opkg list-installed' to identify the installed versionAffected if The installed OpenWrt version is 19.07.0 or 21.02.0
-
Verify WLAN AP driver is loadedCheck if the Mediatek WLAN AP driver kernel module is loaded (e.g., via lsmod, modinfo, or /proc/modules)Affected if The Mediatek WLAN AP driver module (e.g., mt76x2, mt7915, or similar) is present and active
-
Confirm System-level access contextReview system logs or audit records for any indication of compromised privileged accounts or unexpected processes running as rootAffected if An attacker already has System-level access, they could exploit this vulnerability for privilege escalation
A user is affected if they run Mediatek WLAN AP driver on SDK <= 7.6.7.2 or OpenWrt 19.07.0/21.02.0 with the vulnerable driver enabled, and an attacker already has System-level privileges on the device.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor patch (WCNCR00441507) to the WLAN AP driver. Since exploitation requires System-level access, treat this as a defense-in-depth measure for systems with compromised accounts.
MediaTek SDK > 7.6.7.2 (verify patch WCNCR00441507 is included); OpenWRT updated versions beyond 19.07.0 and 21.02.0
- 1. Identify the MediaTek SDK version in use by checking the wlan AP driver package
- 2. Check MediaTek's official corp.mediatek.com for the WCNCR00441507 patch release notes to determine the fixed SDK version
- 3. For OpenWRT users: Check if OpenWRT 19.07.x and 21.02.x branches have released updated kernel/packages that include the MediaTek wlan driver patch
- 4. Upgrade the SDK to a version higher than 7.6.7.2 that incorporates patch WCNCR00441507
- 5. For OpenWRT: Apply available security updates or upgrade to a newer OpenWRT release that includes the fixed wlan driver
- 6. Verify the upgrade by checking the wlan driver version matches the patched release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20734 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20734 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data