AndroidOperating system · Samsung

CVE-2025-20885

MEDIUM · 6.7 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-02-04
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
69/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Out-of-bounds write in softsim trustlet prior to SMR Jan-2025 Release 1 allows local privileged attackers to cause memory corruption.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in the softsim trustlet, which runs within a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE). The flaw allows a local privileged attacker to write data beyond allocated memory boundaries, leading to memory corruption that could potentially be leveraged for privilege escalation or denial of service.

MitigationApply the SMR Jan-2025 Release 1 update or patch to address the vulnerability in the softsim trustlet. Since exploitation requires local privileged access, prioritize patching vulnerable devices and monitor for any unusual memory behavior.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
AndroidOperating system
Affected:= 12.0= 13.0= 14.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check Android version
    Go to Settings > About Phone > Android version and verify the installed version number
    Affected if The version shows 12.0, 13.0, or 14.0 exactly (these are the affected versions)
  2. Confirm device is Samsung
    Verify the device manufacturer is Samsung - check Settings > About Phone > Manufacturer or Model name
    Affected if The device is not a Samsung product (this CVE affects only Samsung Android devices)
  3. Check if softsim is provisioned
    Review device configuration or carrier settings for soft SIM (eSIM) provisioning status - typically found in Settings > Connections > SIM card manager or under carrier-specific menus
    Affected if Soft SIM or eSIM functionality is actively enabled/configured on the device (the trustlet handles this feature)
  4. Identify softsim trustlet version
    Inspect TEE trustlet listing via diagnostic tools or Samsung-specific service menus (may require root or Samsung diagnostic mode access)
    Affected if A softsim trustlet is present and its version is not confirmed as patched in the Jan-2025 SMR release

The device is likely affected if it is a Samsung Android device running version 12.0, 13.0, or 14.0 with softsim/eSIM functionality enabled and the Jan-2025 SMR patch has not been applied.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the SMR Jan-2025 Release 1 update or patch to address the vulnerability in the softsim trustlet. Since exploitation requires local privileged access, prioritize patching vulnerable devices and monitor for any unusual memory behavior.

Recommended fix High confidence

Samsung SMR Jan-2025 Release 1

  1. Navigate to Settings > Software update on the Samsung Galaxy device
  2. Tap 'Download and install' to check for available updates
  3. Locate and install the January 2025 security update (SMR Jan-2025 Release 1)
  4. Verify the update was successful by checking Settings > Software update > Security patch level (should show January 2025 or later)

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Android Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,160.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20885 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20885 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data