CVE-2025-21033
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper access control in ContactProvider prior to SMR Sep-2025 Release 1 allows local attackers to access sensitive information.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceImproper access control in Android's ContactProvider component allows a local attacker to bypass intended permission boundaries and access sensitive contact information without proper authorization. This is a local privilege escalation issue in Samsung mobile devices prior to the September 2025 SMR release.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 14.0= 15.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check the Android version on the Samsung deviceGo to Settings > About Phone > Android version, or run 'getprop ro.build.version.release' via ADB shellAffected if The device is running Android 14.0 or 15.0 (any build within these major versions)
-
Verify the Samsung Security Patch Level (SPL)Go to Settings > About Phone > Software information > Security patch level, or run 'getprop ro.build.version.security_patch' via ADB shellAffected if The security patch level is earlier than September 2025 (e.g., August 2025, July 2025, or older)
-
Confirm the Samsung SMR update versionGo to Settings > About Phone > Software information > Baseband version, or run 'getprop ro.build.version.sw' via ADB shell to check the SMR (Samsung Maintenance Release) versionAffected if The SMR version is earlier than Sep-2025 Release 1 (for example, Aug-2025 or earlier) or the field is empty/unavailable on an Android 14/15 device
-
Inspect ContactProvider permissions (if accessible)Use ADB to run 'dumpsys package com.android.providers.contacts' and examine the permissions section for ContactProvider, or check via Settings > Apps > ContactProvider > PermissionsAffected if ContactProvider shows granted permissions that should require elevated authorization, or the component is exposed to untrusted apps without proper permission checks
-
Check for the presence of the CVE-specific fix indicatorsCompare the device's contact provider APK version via 'pm list packages -f | grep contacts' then check the APK version, or verify the ContactProvider permissions have been tightened after the Sep-2025 updateAffected if The ContactProvider component has not been updated to reflect the Sep-2025 security fix, or permissions remain at pre-patch configuration levels
The device is affected if it runs Android 14.0 or 15.0 and has not received the Samsung SMR September 2025 Release 1 security update, as the ContactProvider improper access control vulnerability remains unpatched.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the Samsung SMR Sep-2025 Release 1 or later security update to affected devices to patch the access control vulnerability in ContactProvider.
SMR Sep-2025 Release 1
- Go to Settings on your Samsung device running Android 14.0 or 15.0
- Tap on 'Software update' or 'System update'
- Tap 'Download and install' to check for available updates
- Select the SMR Sep-2025 Release 1 update when available
- Wait for the update to download and complete installation
- Restart your device to ensure the security patch is fully applied
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,784.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-21033 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-21033 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data