Uncontrolled Search Path (DLL Hijack)Weakness · CWE-427

CVE-2025-21099

MEDIUM · 6.7 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-05-13
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
67/100
Remediation priority · Elevated

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Uncontrolled search path for some Intel(R) Graphics software may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Uncontrolled search path vulnerability in Intel Graphics software allows DLL hijacking. An authenticated local user could place a malicious DLL in a search path location, causing the Intel software to load it and execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges.

MitigationApply Intel-provided patches for affected graphics software versions. As an interim control, ensure the Intel graphics software directory is secured and not writable by standard users, and avoid running the software from untrusted network locations.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
High
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Intel Graphics software
    Open Programs and Features (appwiz.cpl) and look for Intel graphics-related entries such as Intel Graphics Command Center, Intel Graphics Control Panel, Intel UHD Graphics drivers, or similar. Also check C:\Program Files\Intel for graphics-related folders.
    Affected if Intel Graphics software is installed on the system
  2. Determine Intel Graphics software version
    Right-click the Intel graphics entry in Programs and Features and select Properties, then view the Version field. Alternatively, open the installation directory (typically C:\Program Files\Intel\Graphics* or C:\Windows\System32\DriverStore\FileRepository\ig*), right-click the main executable (such as GFX.exe, igfx.exe, or Intel Graphics Control Panel.exe), and check its File Version.
    Affected if The installed version falls within an unpatched range for CVE-2025-21099 (compare your version to Intel's official security advisory for this CVE)
  3. Locate the Intel Graphics installation directory
    Right-click the Intel graphics entry in Programs and Features, select Properties, and note the Install Location path. Common paths include C:\Program Files\Intel\GraphicsDriver or C:\Program Files\Intel\Intel(R) Processor Graphics.
    Affected if The installation directory path is identified for permission checking
  4. Verify directory permissions are not writable by standard users
    Right-click the identified Intel graphics installation folder, select Properties, then go to the Security tab. Click Advanced. Check the Permission entries under the Effective Access tab or review each user/group permission. Ensure standard users (Authenticated Users, Users group, or specific user accounts) do not have Write or Modify permissions to the folder.
    Affected if Standard users have Write or Modify permissions to the Intel Graphics installation directory, allowing them to place a malicious DLL

The system is affected if Intel Graphics software is installed AND the installation directory allows standard users to write files, enabling DLL hijacking exploitation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply Intel-provided patches for affected graphics software versions. As an interim control, ensure the Intel graphics software directory is secured and not writable by standard users, and avoid running the software from untrusted network locations.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-21099 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-21099 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data