CVE-2025-2140
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Engineering Requirements Management Doors Next 7.0.2, 7.0.3, and 7.1 could allow an authenticated user on the network to spoof email identity of the sender due to improper verification of source data.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIBM Engineering Requirements Management Doors Next versions 7.0.2, 7.0.3, and 7.1 contains a vulnerability allowing authenticated network users to spoof the email identity of the sender due to improper verification of source data in the email subsystem.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.0.2= 7.0.3= 7.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Doors Next versionAccess the Doors Next administration console or check the product 'About' information to determine the exact version numberAffected if Version is 7.0.2, 7.0.3, or 7.1
-
Confirm email subsystem is configuredCheck if email notifications or outbound email features are enabled in the Doors Next administration settingsAffected if Email subsystem is active and configured for the product
-
Review email sender configurationExamine the email configuration settings in the Doors Next admin console for any sender verification or authentication controlsAffected if Sender verification is absent, disabled, or set to allow arbitrary sender addresses
-
Inspect email relay settingsLook at the email server relay configuration within Doors Next to see if external sender addresses can be specifiedAffected if The email relay permits spoofed sender identities without validation
-
Check email authentication protocolsReview whether SPF, DKIM, or DMARC validation is enforced for outgoing emails originating from Doors NextAffected if No email authentication protocols are enforced for sender verification
You are affected if you run Doors Next version 7.0.2, 7.0.3, or 7.1 with the email subsystem enabled and without proper sender identity verification configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement proper verification of email source data, likely including validation of sender identity, authentication checks, and possibly integration with standard email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) or application-level sender verification.
Latest available 7.x release or IBM-provided security patch for your current version (contact IBM Support for specific fix version)
- Identify your current IBM Engineering Requirements Management Doors Next version (7.0.2, 7.0.3, or 7.1) from the IBM Jazz-based server administration console
- Contact IBM Support or access the IBM Fix Central portal to obtain the security fix for CVE-2025-2140
- Request the interim fix (iFix) or upgrade package specific to your current version
- Apply the fix following IBM's standard patching procedure for Doors Next requirements management
- Verify the fix was applied successfully by checking the version information and testing email functionality
- Confirm the CORS/origin validation is working correctly by testing from authorized network locations
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-2140 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-2140 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data