CVE-2025-21462
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMemory corruption while processing an IOCTL request, when buffer significantly exceeds the command argument limit.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA memory corruption vulnerability exists in IOCTL request handling where inadequate boundary validation allows a buffer to significantly exceed the command argument limit, leading to memory corruption. This could allow a local attacker to escalate privileges or cause a denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Qualcomm wireless hardware in the systemOpen Device Manager (Windows) or run 'lspci | grep -i network' (Linux) to list network adapters. Look for Qualcomm Fastconnect or Snapdragon product names such as Fastconnect 6900, Fastconnect 7800, Sa4150p, Sa4155p, Sa6155p, Sa8155p, Sa8195p, or Sc8380xp in the adapter description or hardware IDs.Affected if Any of the listed Qualcomm wireless products (Fastconnect 6900/7800 or any Sa/Snapdragon model in the list) are present in the system.
-
Verify the IOCTL interface is loadedCheck if the Qualcomm wireless driver is loaded and running. On Windows, run 'sc query QWAVE' or check Device Manager for the Qualcomm wireless adapter status. On Linux, check 'lsmod' for loaded wireless modules or check 'rfkill list' output for Qualcomm devices.Affected if The Qualcomm wireless adapter driver is loaded and active, exposing the vulnerable IOCTL handler.
-
Check for exposed IOCTL device interfaceOn Windows, enumerate device interfaces related to Qualcomm wireless: open an elevated command prompt and run 'powershell Get-PnpDevice -Class Net | Where-Object {$_.FriendlyName -match "Qualcomm"}' to list active Qualcomm network devices. Check for associated device paths under \\Device\\ or in the registry under HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services.Affected if The system has an active Qualcomm wireless device with an exposed IOCTL interface that accepts user-mode requests.
A system is affected if it contains any Qualcomm Fastconnect 6900/7800 or Snapdragon (Sa/Sc series) wireless hardware with the driver loaded, since all firmware versions of these products are vulnerable to the memory corruption flaw in IOCTL handling.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor security updates for the affected Windows kernel/driver component. Until patched, restrict local access to privileged users only to reduce attack surface.
- Identify the specific Qualcomm component (Fastconnect or Snapdragon Automotive) in your product by checking the firmware version or BOM
- Contact Qualcomm directly through their secure reporting channel or your Qualcomm representative to request the firmware patch for CVE-2025-21462
- Contact your device/OEM manufacturer if you are not Qualcomm directly, as they will need to integrate the Qualcomm patch into their firmware release
- Apply the vendor-provided firmware update that addresses the out-of-bounds write vulnerability in the IOCTL request handling
- Verify the patch was applied successfully by confirming the updated firmware version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-21462 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-21462 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data