CVE-2025-21560
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVulnerability in the Oracle Agile PLM Framework product of Oracle Supply Chain (component: SDK-Software Development Kit). The supported version that is affected is 9.3.6. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Agile PLM Framework. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Agile PLM Framework accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.5 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an information disclosure vulnerability in the Oracle Agile PLM Framework SDK component. A low-privileged attacker with network access via HTTP can exploit this to gain unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all accessible data within the Oracle Agile PLM system. The high confidentiality impact with no integrity or availability impact suggests the vulnerability allows reading sensitive data without modification.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.3.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Oracle Agile PLM installation and versionLocate the Oracle Agile PLM installation directory and check the version manifest or About information. Common paths include the installation root directory or within the application server logs. Use the application's About or version information page if accessible.Affected if The installed version is exactly 9.3.6
-
Confirm SDK component is presentCheck for the presence of the Oracle Agile PLM Framework SDK directories or JAR files within the installation. Look for SDK-related folders or libraries in the installation root.Affected if The SDK component is installed as part of the Oracle Agile PLM deployment
-
Verify SDK endpoints are network-accessibleTest network connectivity to common Oracle Agile SDK HTTP endpoints from a low-privileged network position. Check if the SDK servlet or service endpoints respond to HTTP requests.Affected if SDK endpoints are reachable over the network without authentication or with low-privileged credentials
-
Review SDK access controlsExamine the SDK configuration and user role assignments to determine if low-privileged users can access SDK endpoints. Check the SDK configuration files or admin settings for permission levels.Affected if Low-privileged or unauthenticated users can access sensitive data through the SDK interface
You are affected if Oracle Agile PLM version 9.3.6 is installed with the SDK component exposed to network access, allowing low-privileged users to retrieve sensitive data via HTTP requests to SDK endpoints.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the Oracle security patch for CVE-2025-21560 to the Oracle Agile PLM Framework 9.3.6 installation. If no patch is available, restrict network access to the SDK endpoints and review user privilege assignments until a patch can be applied.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-21560 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-21560 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data