CVE-2025-21596
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the command-line processing of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX1500, SRX4100, and SRX4200 devices allows a local, low-privileged authenticated attacker executing the 'show chassis environment pem' command to cause the chassis daemon (chassisd) to crash and restart, resulting in a temporary Denial of Service (DoS). However, repeated execution of this command will eventually cause the chassisd process to fail to restart, impacting packet processing on the system. This issue affects Junos OS on SRX1500, SRX4100, SRX4200: * All versions before 21.4R3-S9, * from 22.2 before 22.2R3-S5, * from 22.3 before 22.3R3-S4, * from 22.4 before 22.4R3-S4, * from 23.2 before 23.2R2-S3, * from 23.4 before 23.4R2-S1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA command-line processing vulnerability in Junos OS on SRX1500, SRX4100, and SRX4200 devices allows a low-privileged local attacker to trigger improper exception handling in the chassis daemon (chassisd) by executing the 'show chassis environment pem' command. This causes repeated daemon crashes and restarts, ultimately leading to permanent failure of the chassisd process and packet processing disruption.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 21.4= 21.4= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4= 23.2= 23.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelRun 'show chassis hardware' or 'show system information' to confirm the device is an SRX1500, SRX4100, or SRX4200Affected if Device model is NOT one of SRX1500, SRX4100, or SRX4200 - the vulnerability does not apply
-
Check Junos OS versionRun 'show version' to obtain the installed Junos OS version and compare it against the affected ranges: < 21.4, 21.4, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, 23.2, or 23.4Affected if The installed version matches any of the affected versions listed (including all versions below 21.4)
-
Verify CLI access existsConfirm that low-privileged users have access to the Junos CLI and can execute operational commandsAffected if Untrusted or low-privileged users have CLI access - they can trigger the flaw by running 'show chassis environment pem'
-
Check for chassisd crash symptomsReview system logs (syslog) or run 'show system core-dumps' and 'show log messages' for chassisd crash entries, or use 'request support information' to look for daemon restart patternsAffected if Repeated chassisd crashes or restarts are observed in logs, indicating the vulnerability may have been triggered
You are affected if your device is an SRX1500, SRX4100, or SRX4200 running any Junos version that matches < 21.4, 21.4, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, 23.2, or 23.4, AND untrusted users can access the CLI to run the 'show chassis environment pem' command.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped21.4
Upgrade Junos OS to a fixed version (21.4R3-S9, 22.2R3-S5, 22.3R3-S4, 22.4R3-S4, 23.2R2-S3, or 23.4R2-S1) per the vendor advisory. Until then, restrict CLI access to trusted personnel only.
Any of: 21.4R3-S9 or later, 22.2R3-S5 or later, 22.3R3-S4 or later, 22.4R3-S4 or later, 23.2R2-S3 or later, 23.4R2-S1 or later
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS version by running 'show version' in the CLI
- 2. Review the installed configuration and verify backup of current configuration
- 3. Download the appropriate fixed Junos OS release from Juniper Networks support portal based on your current branch
- 4. Transfer the upgrade package to the device using 'file copy' or appropriate file transfer method
- 5. Initiate the software upgrade using 'request system software add <package-name>' command
- 6. Reboot the device after upgrade completes using 'request system reboot'
- 7. After reboot, verify the new Junos version is installed using 'show version'
- 8. Verify the chassis daemon is running properly using 'show chassis environment pem' and checking process status
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-21596 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-21596 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data