CVE-2025-21597
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated, logically adjacent BGP peer to cause Denial of Service (DoS). On all Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved platforms, when BGP rib-sharding and update-threading are configured, and a BGP peer flap is done with specific timing, rpd crashes and restarts. Continuous peer flapping at specific time intervals will result in a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition. This issue affects eBGP and iBGP, in both IPv4 and IPv6 implementations. This issue requires a remote attacker to have at least one established BGP session. The issue can occur with or without logical-systems enabled. This issue affects: Junos OS: * All versions before 20.4R3-S8, * 21.2 versions before 21.2R3-S6, * 21.3 versions before 21.3R3-S5, * 21.4 versions before 21.4R3-S4, * 22.1 versions before 22.1R3-S3, * 22.2 versions before 22.2R3-S1, * 22.3 versions before 22.3R3, * 22.4 versions before 22.4R3. Junos OS Evolved: * All versions before 21.2R3-S6-EVO, * 21.3-EVO versions before 21.3R3-S5-EVO, * 21.4-EVO versions before 21.4R3-S4-EVO, * 22.1-EVO versions before 22.1R3-S3-EVO, * 22.2-EVO versions before :22.2R3-S1-EVO, * 22.3-EVO versions before 22.3R3-EVO, * 22.4-EVO versions before 22.4R3-EVO.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA race condition in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS causes a crash when BGP peer flapping occurs while rib-sharding and update-threading are configured. An attacker with an established BGP session can trigger repeated crashes by flapping the peer at specific time intervals, resulting in sustained denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 20.4= 20.4= 21.2= 21.3= 21.4= 22.1= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4< 21.2= 21.2= 21.3= 21.4= 22.1= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Junos OS versionRun 'show version' or 'show version detail' to retrieve the installed Junos OS versionAffected if The installed version matches the affected ranges: Junos < 20.4, = 20.4, = 21.2, = 21.3, = 21.4, = 22.1, = 22.2, = 22.3, = 22.4 or Junos OS Evolved < 21.2, = 21.2, = 21.3, = 21.4, = 22.1, = 22.2, = 22.3, = 22.4
-
Verify rib-sharding configurationRun 'show configuration | display set | match rib-sharding' or view the routing options configuration to see if rib-sharding is enabledAffected if rib-sharding is configured and active in the routing daemon configuration
-
Verify update-threading configurationRun 'show configuration | display set | match update-threading' or view the BGP group configuration to check if update-threading is enabledAffected if update-threading is configured under the BGP peer or group configuration
-
Confirm BGP is configuredRun 'show configuration protocols bgp' to view the BGP configuration and identify configured peers or groupsAffected if BGP is configured with active peers, especially if rib-sharding and update-threading are applied to BGP-specific routing instances
You are affected if your Junos version is in the affected list AND both rib-sharding and update-threading are configured with active BGP peers, enabling the race condition to trigger on BGP peer flapping.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped20.421.2
Upgrade Junos OS/Evolved to a patched version listed in the advisory and consider disabling rib-sharding or update-threading as a temporary mitigation if upgrading is not immediately feasible.
Upgrade to Junos OS 20.4R3-S8 / 21.2R3-S6 / 21.3R3-S5 / 21.4R3-S4 / 22.1R3-S3 / 22.2R3-S1 / 22.3R3 / 22.4R3 or later, or Junos OS Evolved 21.2R3-S6-EVO / 21.3R3-S5-EVO / 21.4R3-S4-EVO / 22.1R3-S3-EVO / 22.2R3-S1-EVO / 22.3R3-EVO / 22.4R3-EVO or later
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS or Junos OS Evolved version running on the device using 'show version'
- 2. Check if BGP rib-sharding and update-threading are configured using 'show configuration protocols bgp' and looking for rib-sharding or update-threading statements
- 3. If affected version is identified and features are in use, plan for upgrade to fixed version
- 4. Before upgrade, ensure you have a valid configuration backup and understand the upgrade procedure
- 5. Upgrade to one of the fixed versions: Junos OS 20.4R3-S8, 21.2R3-S6, 21.3R3-S5, 21.4R3-S4, 22.1R3-S3, 22.2R3-S1, 22.3R3, or 22.4R3 (or later)
- 5b. For Junos OS Evolved, upgrade to 21.2R3-S6-EVO, 21.3R3-S5-EVO, 21.4R3-S4-EVO, 22.1R3-S3-EVO, 22.2R3-S1-EVO, 22.3R3-EVO, or 22.4R3-EVO (or later)
- 6. After upgrade, verify rpd is running normally using 'show routing-instance' and 'show bgp summary'
- 7. Monitor for any BGP peer flaps to confirm the DoS condition is resolved
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-21597 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-21597 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data