CVE-2025-21601
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Following of Specification by Caller vulnerability in web management (J-Web, Captive Portal, 802.1X, Juniper Secure Connect (JSC) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series, EX Series, MX240, MX480, MX960, QFX5120 Series, allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker, sending genuine traffic targeted to the device to cause the CPU to climb until the device becomes unresponsive. Continuous receipt of these packets will create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition. This issue affects Junos OS: * All versions before 21.4R3-S9, * from 22.2 before 22.2R3-S5, * from 22.4 before 22.4R3-S4, * from 23.2 before 23.2R2-S3, * from 23.4 before 23.4R2-S3, * from 24.2 before 24.2R1-S1, 24.2R2. An indicator of compromise is to review the CPU % of the httpd process in the CLI: e.g. show system processes extensive | match httpd PID nobody 52 0 20M 191M select 2 0:01 80.00% httpd{httpd} <<<<< the percentage of httpd usage if high may be an indicator
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn improper specification following vulnerability in Junos OS web management components (J-Web, Captive Portal, 802.1X, JSC) allows unauthenticated network attackers to send specially crafted traffic that causes excessive CPU consumption in the httpd process, leading to device unresponsiveness and sustained DoS.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 21.4= 21.4= 22.2= 22.4= 23.2= 23.4= 24.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed Junos OS versionRun 'show version' on the device and note the exact Junos version number (e.g., 21.4R1, 22.2R3, etc.)Affected if The installed version matches one of the affected versions: any release <= 21.4, or exactly 21.4, 22.2, 22.4, 23.2, 23.4, or 24.2
-
Verify if J-Web interface is enabledRun 'show system services web-management' and check for J-Web configuration statusAffected if J-Web is listed as enabled (the vulnerability affects J-Web, Captive Portal, 802.1X, and JSC web management components)
-
Confirm httpd process is runningRun 'show system processes httpd' or 'show system processes | match httpd' to verify the httpd process is activeAffected if The httpd process is running and the device has web management services enabled
-
Check management access policyReview configuration for 'set system services web-management' and associated access policies, or inspect firewall filter terms applied to the lo0.0 interfaceAffected if Web management interfaces (HTTP/HTTPS) are accessible from untrusted networks rather than restricted to trusted management subnets only
You are affected if your Junos version matches the affected list AND web management services (J-Web, Captive Portal, 802.1X, or JSC) are enabled and accessible from untrusted networks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor-supplied patches for affected versions (21.4R3-S9, 22.2R3-S5, 22.4R3-S4, 23.2R2-S3, 23.4R2-S3, 24.2R1-S1, or 24.2R2 and later); as interim mitigation, restrict access to web management interfaces to trusted management networks only.
Upgrade to 21.4R3-S9 or later; 22.2R3-S5 or later; 22.4R3-S4 or later; 23.2R2-S3 or later; 23.4R2-S3 or later; or 24.2R1-S1/24.2R2 or later (recommend latest stable 24.2 branch for longest support window)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS version on the affected device using: show version
- 2. Review the installed Junos software and confirm the version falls within the affected ranges: <21.4R3-S9, 22.2R1-R3-S4, 22.4R1-R3-S3, 23.2R1-R2-S2, 23.4R1-R2-S2, 24.2R1
- 3. Plan an upgrade maintenance window as the device will require a reboot
- 4. Download the appropriate fixed Junos OS release for your hardware platform from the Juniper Networks support portal
- 5. Upload the Junos OS upgrade package to the device using: file copy or USB
- 6. Install the upgrade using: request system software add <package-name> reboot
- 7. After the device reboots, verify the new version: show version
- 8. Monitor the httpd process CPU usage to confirm the issue is resolved: show system processes extensive | match httpd
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-21601 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-21601 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data