CVE-2025-21602
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated adjacent attacker sending a specific BGP update packet to cause rpd to crash and restart, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS). Continuous receipt and processing of this packet will create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition. This issue affects iBGP and eBGP, and both IPv4 and IPv6 are affected by this vulnerability. This issue affects Junos OS: * from 21.4 before 21.4R3-S9, * from 22.2 before 22.2R3-S5, * from 22.3 before 22.3R3-S4, * from 22.4 before 22.4R3-S5, * from 23.2 before 23.2R2-S3, * from 23.4 before 23.4R2-S3, * from 24.2 before 24.2R1-S2, 24.2R2; This issue does not affect versions prior to 21.1R1. Junos OS Evolved: * from 21.4 before 21.4R3-S9-EVO, * from 22.2 before 22.2R3-S5-EVO, * from 22.3 before 22.3R3-S4-EVO, * from 22.4 before 22.4R3-S5-EVO, * from 23.2 before 23.2R2-S3-EVO, * from 23.4 before 23.4R2-S3-EVO, * from 24.2 before 24.2R1-S2-EVO, 24.2R2-EVO. This issue does not affect versions prior to 21.1R1-EVO
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in Juniper Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved's routing protocol daemon (rpd) allows an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to send a specially crafted BGP update packet that causes rpd to crash and restart, creating a denial of service. Continuous receipt of the malicious packet sustains the DoS condition. The vulnerability affects both iBGP and eBGP across IPv4 and IPv6.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 21.2= 21.4= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4= 23.2= 23.4= 24.2= 21.2= 21.4= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4= 23.2= 23.4= 24.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Junos OS versionRun 'show version' on the device CLI to obtain the exact Junos OS version installedAffected if The installed version matches any of the affected versions: 21.2, 21.4, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, 23.2, 23.4, or 24.2
-
Confirm BGP is configuredRun 'show configuration protocols bgp' to display the BGP configuration and verify BGP is actively configuredAffected if BGP protocol is configured and enabled on the device
-
Verify rpd is runningRun 'show system processes routing' or check process monitoring to confirm the routing protocol daemon (rpd) is activeAffected if The rpd process is running and handling BGP sessions
The device is affected if it runs any of the listed Junos OS or Junos OS Evolved versions and has BGP protocol enabled with the rpd daemon active to process BGP updates.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-supplied software updates (21.4R3-S9, 22.2R3-S5, 22.3R3-S4, 22.4R3-S5, 23.2R2-S3, 23.4R2-S3, 24.2R1-S2 or 24.2R2 and later) to all affected devices. Consider implementing BGP route filtering or prefix limits as interim mitigation if immediate patching is not feasible.
Upgrade to the latest S-release or R-release in your current train (e.g., 21.4R3-S9, 22.2R3-S5, 22.3R3-S4, 22.4R3-S5, 23.2R2-S3, 23.4R2-S3, or 24.2R2)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS or Junos OS Evolved version using `show version` command
- 2. Determine the appropriate upgrade path based on current version: if on 21.4x, upgrade to 21.4R3-S9 or later; if on 22.2x, upgrade to 22.2R3-S5 or later; if on 22.3x, upgrade to 22.3R3-S4 or later; if on 22.4x, upgrade to 22.4R3-S5 or later; if on 23.2x, upgrade to 23.2R2-S3 or later; if on 23.4x, upgrade to 23.4R2-S3 or later; if on 24.2x, upgrade to 24.2R1-S2 or 24.2R2 or later
- 3. Download the appropriate junos-srx orevo package from the Juniper support portal matching the target version
- 4. Validate the software package integrity using MD5/SHA checksums from Juniper support
- 5. Upload the software package to the device using `file copy` or FTP/SCP
- 6. For Junos OS: install the upgrade using `request system software add <package> no-validate reboot`
- 7. For Junos OS Evolved: use `request system software add <package>` followed by `request system reboot`
- 8. After reboot, verify the new version with `show version` and confirm BGP peering is operational with `show bgp summary`
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-21602 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-21602 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data