CVE-2025-2190
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe mobile application (com.transsnet.store) has a man-in-the-middle attack vulnerability, which may lead to code injection risks.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA man-in-the-middle (MITM) vulnerability in the mobile application com.transsnet.store allows attackers on the same network to intercept and potentially tamper with communications between the app and its backend servers, which could enable injection of malicious code into the application's data flow.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 9.1.0, <= 9.2.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if com.transsnet.store app is installedOn Android: Check device settings under Apps or use ADB command 'pm list packages | grep transsnet'. On iOS: Check installed apps list for Transsnet Store.Affected if The com.transsnet.store application is present on the device
-
Determine the installed application versionOn Android: Go to Settings > Apps > com.transsnet.store > App info, or use 'dumpsys package com.transsnet.store' via ADB to read the versionName. On iOS: Go to App Store > Purchased, or check the app's info.plist if you have access to the IPA.Affected if The displayed version falls within the range 9.1.0 through 9.2.6 inclusive
-
Verify if certificate pinning is properly implementedAttempt to intercept traffic using a MITM proxy (such as Burp Suite or OWASP ZAP) configured with a self-signed certificate. If the app successfully establishes connections through the proxy without certificate validation errors, pinning is not enforced.Affected if The app allows MITM proxy interception without certificate errors, indicating missing or weak certificate validation
The environment is affected if the com.transsnet.store app is installed with version 9.1.0 to 9.2.6 and certificate validation or pinning is not properly enforced, allowing MITM attacks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement certificate validation and certificate pinning in the mobile application to ensure secure communication and prevent MITM attacks from injecting malicious code.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-2190 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-2190 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data