CVE-2025-22422
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn multiple locations, there is a possible way to mislead a user into approving an authentication prompt for one app when its result will be used in another due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA logic error in authentication prompt handling allows an attacker to trick the system into using authentication results intended for one application in another context, leading to local privilege escalation. This occurs across multiple code locations where the association between authentication prompts and their target applications is not properly validated.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 13.0= 14.0= 15.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Android versionGo to Settings > About Phone > Android version, or run 'getprop ro.build.version.release' via ADB shellAffected if The version is exactly 13.0, 14.0, or 15.0 (not a later security patch release that may contain the fix)
-
Confirm biometric or credential authentication is in useCheck Settings > Security > biometrics or any app that uses fingerprint/face/password authenticationAffected if Any biometric or credential-based authentication is enrolled and active on the device
-
Identify applications using authentication promptsReview installed apps for any that request biometric, PIN, password, or other credential-based authenticationAffected if Multiple applications that trigger authentication prompts are installed on the device
-
Check for third-party authentication librariesInspect installed apps for use of biometric APIs (android.hardware.biometrics) or Keystore authentication, which could be affected by improper prompt bindingAffected if Applications using Android's built-in authentication frameworks are present
A user is affected if their device runs Android 13.0, 14.0, or 15.0 and uses any authentication-protected features, as the logic flaw allows authentication results to be improperly redirected between applications.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedFix the authentication flow logic to ensure prompts are correctly bound to their intended target application and verify the authentication context before accepting results. Review all locations where authentication results are consumed.
Latest available Android security update for Android 13.0/14.0/15.0 (typically the February 2025 Android Security Bulletin or later)
- 1. Check your current Android version by going to Settings > About Phone > Android version
- 2. Check your current security patch level by going to Settings > About Phone > Security patch level
- 3. Update your device to the latest available Android security update for your version (13.0, 14.0, or 15.0)
- 4. On Pixel devices, go to Settings > System > Software update to check for updates
- 5. On other Android devices, check with your device manufacturer's update channels
- 6. Verify the security patch level has been updated to include the fix for CVE-2025-22422
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,776.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-22422 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-22422 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data