CVE-2025-22423
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn ParseTag of dng_ifd.cpp, there is a possible way to crash the image renderer due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA missing bounds check in the ParseTag function of dng_ifd.cpp (DNG image format parser) allows attackers to trigger an out-of-bounds memory access by providing specially crafted DNG image files, causing the image renderer to crash. No user interaction or elevated privileges are required for exploitation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 13.0= 14.0= 15.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Android OS versionGo to Settings > About Phone > Android version, or run 'getprop ro.build.version.release' via ADB shellAffected if The reported version is 13.0, 14.0, or 15.0 (exact match)
-
Identify DNG image processing usageCheck if the device has apps or services that automatically process DNG image files, such as gallery apps, photo editors, or thumbnail generation services. Inspect installed apps that handle camera RAW files.Affected if DNG processing apps or services are present and active on the device
-
Verify automatic thumbnail generation is enabledCheck Settings > Photos > Settings (or similar) for options like 'Show thumbnails', 'Generate previews', or 'Process RAW images automatically'. On Android, this may also be found in Google Photos or vendor gallery app settings.Affected if Automatic thumbnail or preview generation for DNG files is enabled
-
Check for DNG library componentSearch for the library containing dng_ifd.cpp on the system. This is typically part of Android's media processing framework. Look in /system/lib/ or /vendor/lib/ for libraries related to DNG/RAW image handling, or check app permissions for camera/storage access that would enable DNG processing.Affected if The DNG parsing library is present and the app has permissions to process images
A user is affected if their Android device runs version 13.0, 14.0, or 15.0 and has DNG image processing or automatic thumbnail generation enabled, as the vulnerability triggers when processing specially crafted DNG files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor security updates to the affected image processing library. Until patched, consider sandboxing image processing workflows or disabling automatic thumbnail generation for untrusted sources.
Latest Android security update containing the fix for CVE-2025-22423 (Android Security Bulletin)
- Check for and install the latest Android system updates on the device by going to Settings > System > Software Update
- Ensure the device has the latest Android Security Bulletin patch applied. Go to Settings > About Phone > Android Security Patch Level to verify
- If the device manufacturer has released an update containing this fix, apply it. For Pixel devices, ensure you have the latest monthly security update
- After updating, verify the fix by confirming the Android Security Patch Level is later than the vulnerability disclosure date
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-22423 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-22423 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data