CVE-2025-22433
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn canForward of IntentForwarderActivity.java, there is a possible bypass of the cross profile intent filter most commonly used in Work Profile scenarios due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA logic error in the canForward method of IntentForwarderActivity.java allows bypass of cross-profile intent filters in Android Work Profile scenarios. The vulnerability enables local privilege escalation by allowing intents to be forwarded across profile boundaries without proper validation, despite the cross-profile intent filter protections.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 13.0= 14.0= 15.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Android versionGo to Settings > About Phone > Android version (or run 'getprop ro.build.version.release' via ADB)Affected if Device runs Android 13.0, 14.0, or 15.0 specifically (not other versions)
-
Confirm Work Profile is configuredGo to Settings > Accounts > Work Profile (or check for work profile icon in status bar, or run 'dumpsys device_policy' via ADB)Affected if A managed Work Profile is set up on the device (vulnerability only applies in Work Profile scenarios)
-
Check Security Patch LevelGo to Settings > About Phone > Security patch level (or run 'getprop ro.build.version.security_patch' via ADB)Affected if Security patch level is earlier than the vendor fix for this specific logic error in IntentForwarderActivity.java canForward method
-
Inspect IntentForwarderActivity accessibilityCheck if IntentForwarderActivity component is exported and accessible across profiles (run 'dumpsys package <packagename>' for system packages containing this activity)Affected if IntentForwarderActivity is exported and no additional profile-boundary enforcement is present beyond the vulnerable canForward method logic
Device is affected if running Android 13.0, 14.0, or 15.0 with an active Work Profile and a Security Patch Level predating the vendor fix for the canForward logic error in IntentForwarderActivity.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-provided Android security patch containing the fix for the logic error in IntentForwarderActivity.java canForward method. Organizations with managed Work Profiles should verify the patch is applied to all affected devices.
Android Security Patch Level (date varies by device manufacturer - check Android Security Bulletin for the specific release containing the fix)
- Check your Android device's current security patch level in Settings > About Phone > Android version > Security patch level
- Identify which Android Security Bulletin addressed this vulnerability (CVE-2025-22433)
- If your device has not received a security update containing the fix for this CVE, contact your device manufacturer or carrier for the latest security update
- Apply the latest available Android security update for your device model
- After updating, verify the security patch level has been updated to include the fix for CVE-2025-22433
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-22433 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-22433 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data