CVE-2025-22482
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA use of externally-controlled format string vulnerability has been reported to affect Qsync Central. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow remote attackers who have gained user access to obtain secret data or modify memory. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version: Qsync Central 4.5.0.6 ( 2025/03/20 ) and later
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a format string vulnerability in Qsync Central where user-supplied input is used directly as a format string parameter instead of being treated as data. Attackers who have obtained valid user credentials can exploit this to read stack values (via %x, %s specifiers) to leak sensitive data or potentially write to memory locations to modify program execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.5.0.3, < 4.5.0.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Qsync Central is installedCheck for Qsync Central process or installation on the QNAP system. This may be done via the QNAP App Center, command line (ps aux | grep -i qsync), or checking the /share folder for Qsync installations.Affected if Qsync Central is not installed on the system.
-
Determine installed Qsync Central versionAccess QNAP App Center and view the installed version of Qsync Central, or use the QNAP CLI if available to query the package version.Affected if Unable to confirm the version number from available sources.
-
Compare version against vulnerable rangeCheck if the installed version falls within >= 4.5.0.3 and < 4.5.0.6. Versions 4.5.0.3, 4.5.0.4, and 4.5.0.5 are vulnerable. Version 4.5.0.6 and later are fixed.Affected if The installed version is 4.5.0.3, 4.5.0.4, or 4.5.0.5.
-
Verify Qsync Central network accessibilityConfirm whether Qsync Central is exposed to untrusted networks. Check firewall rules, port forwarding, or VPN settings that control access to the Qsync Central web interface or sync ports.Affected if Qsync Central is accessible from untrusted networks without proper network segmentation.
-
Assess authentication exposureDetermine if user accounts with Qsync Central access are limited to trusted personnel only, since valid credentials are required for exploitation.Affected if Qsync Central credentials are distributed to untrusted users or the account pool is large and not closely managed.
The environment is affected if Qsync Central version 4.5.0.3, 4.5.0.4, or 4.5.0.5 is installed and attackers could obtain valid user credentials to reach the application.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.5.0.6
Update Qsync Central to version 4.5.0.6 or later. Until then, enforce strict access controls and limit Qsync Central to trusted users only, as authentication is required for exploitation.
Qsync Central 4.5.0.6
- 1. Log in to the QNAP NAS admin interface.
- 2. Navigate to the Qsync Central application settings.
- 3. Check the current version to confirm it is between 4.5.0.3 and 4.5.0.5 (inclusive).
- 4. Access the QNAP App Center or Qsync Central update mechanism.
- 5. Check for and install the available update to Qsync Central 4.5.0.6 or later.
- 6. Verify the installation was successful by confirming the running version is 4.5.0.6 or higher.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-22482 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-22482 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data