CVE-2025-22504
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type vulnerability in jumpdemand 4ECPS Web Forms 4ecps-webforms allows Upload a Web Shell to a Web Server.This issue affects 4ECPS Web Forms: from n/a through <= 0.2.18.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe 4ECPS Web Forms application contains an unrestricted file upload vulnerability in versions through 0.2.18 that fails to properly validate uploaded file types, allowing attackers to upload executable web shell files that can be accessed and executed on the server to achieve remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify jumpdemand 4ECPS Web Forms installationLocate the application by checking for the 'jumpdemand' or '4ECPS' directories in your web server's web root (e.g., /var/www/html, C:\inetpub\wwwroot) or application installation folder. Look for configuration files or metadata that identify the software name.Affected if The application is found and is named jumpdemand 4ECPS Web Forms
-
Check installed versionOpen the application's configuration file, package.json, or any version manifest located in the application directory. Compare the version number to the affected range (versions up to 0.2.18).Affected if The installed version is 0.2.18 or any earlier version
-
Verify file upload feature is accessibleCheck the application's routing or endpoints to confirm the file upload functionality is exposed. Look for upload-related routes, forms, or API endpoints that accept file submissions.Affected if The file upload endpoint is accessible and operational
-
Inspect server-side file validation configurationReview the application's configuration files or source code for file validation logic. Check for MIME type verification, extension whitelist, or content-type validation on upload handlers.Affected if No MIME type validation, extension whitelist, or content inspection is configured OR validation can be easily bypassed
-
Check uploaded file storage locationLocate the directory where uploaded files are stored. Determine if this directory is within the web root (publicly accessible via HTTP/HTTPS).Affected if Uploaded files are stored inside the web root and are accessible via web requests
You are affected if jumpdemand 4ECPS Web Forms version 0.2.18 or earlier is installed, the file upload feature is enabled, and either file validation is missing/bypassable or uploaded files are stored in a web-accessible location.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict allowlist-based file type validation, verify file content (magic bytes) rather than just extensions, store uploads outside the webroot directory, and disable script execution in upload directories.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-22504 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-22504 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data