CVE-2025-22507
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in iDo8p WPMU Prefill Post wpmu-prefill-post allows SQL Injection.This issue affects WPMU Prefill Post: from n/a through <= 1.02.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL Injection vulnerability in the iDo8p WPMU Prefill Post WordPress plugin allows attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through unsanitized user input in database queries, potentially enabling unauthorized data access, modification, or deletion.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the WPMU Prefill Post plugin installationCheck the WordPress plugins directory (wp-content/plugins/) for a folder named 'wpmu-prefill-post', 'ido8p-wpmu-prefill-post', or similar variant containing 'prefill post' in the nameAffected if The plugin folder exists in the plugins directory
-
Identify the installed plugin versionOpen the main plugin PHP file (usually named similar to the folder) and locate the plugin header comment containing 'Version:' or check the WordPress admin Plugins page for the installed version numberAffected if A version number is displayed in the plugin header or admin interface
-
Determine if the plugin is activeCheck the WordPress admin under Plugins > Installed Plugins to see if WPMU Prefill Post or iDo8p Prefill Post is currently activatedAffected if The plugin shows as Active in the WordPress admin panel
-
Inspect for unsanitized database queriesExamine the plugin's PHP files for direct $wpdb->query(), $wpdb->get_results(), or similar calls that use user-supplied parameters without $wpdb->prepare() or equivalent escapingAffected if Direct SQL queries reference $_POST, $_GET, or $_REQUEST variables without using prepare() statements or input sanitization
-
Review input-handling functionsSearch plugin PHP files for functions that process user input (search parameters, form submissions, URL parameters) and trace whether these values flow into database queries without sanitizationAffected if User-supplied parameters from forms or URLs are used directly in SQL queries without prepare() or escaping functions
A user is affected if the WPMU Prefill Post plugin is installed and active with any version that contains unsanitized user input in database query code paths.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to the latest version of WPMU Prefill Post. If no patch is available, review and sanitize all database query inputs using $wpdb->prepare() or equivalent prepared statement functions, and implement input validation on all user-supplied parameters.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-22507 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-22507 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data