SQL InjectionWeakness · CWE-89

CVE-2025-22523

CRITICAL · 9.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-03-28
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in scheduler Schedule schedule allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects Schedule: from n/a through <= 1.0.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A blind SQL injection vulnerability exists in the scheduler component of the Schedule application. Attackers can inject malicious SQL commands through unsanitized input in scheduler functionality, potentially allowing unauthorized data access or manipulation.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of Schedule that addresses this SQL injection vulnerability. Until a patch is available, implement strict input validation and convert all database queries to parameterized queries/prepared statements.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Schedule application installation and version
    Locate the Schedule application installation directory or check running services to identify the installed version. Common methods: check application metadata files, running process information, or package manager listings.
    Affected if The installed version falls within any affected version range and the scheduler component is accessible.
  2. Identify if scheduler component is enabled
    Examine the Schedule application's configuration files or admin settings to determine whether the scheduler functionality is enabled. Look for scheduler-related settings, modules, or service endpoints.
    Affected if The scheduler component is enabled and accessible to users or network callers.
  3. Verify web/API exposure of scheduler functionality
    Review web server configuration, application routing, or API endpoints to identify if the scheduler component is exposed via HTTP/HTTPS. Check for scheduler-related URLs, endpoints, or service ports.
    Affected if The scheduler functionality is exposed over a network without proper access controls.
  4. Inspect input handling in scheduler endpoints
    If accessible, examine how user-supplied input is processed in scheduler-related requests. Look for unsanitized parameters that could be used in SQL queries.
    Affected if The application accepts user input in scheduler functionality without documented input validation or parameterized query usage.
  5. Check database query implementation
    Review application source code or configuration to determine if database queries in the scheduler component use parameterized queries/prepared statements versus string concatenation.
    Affected if Database queries in the scheduler component are constructed using string concatenation or unsanitized input rather than parameterized queries.

You are affected if the Schedule application with an exposed and enabled scheduler component is running a version that has not been patched for this SQL injection vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of Schedule that addresses this SQL injection vulnerability. Until a patch is available, implement strict input validation and convert all database queries to parameterized queries/prepared statements.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-22523 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-22523 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data