dbcve.org
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2025-22559

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-01-07
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in tubepress TubePress.NET tubepressnet allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects TubePress.NET: from n/a through <= 4.0.1.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in TubePress.NET plugin/component up to version 4.0.1 allows attackers to induce authenticated users to perform unintended state-changing actions. The vulnerability exists due to missing or inadequate CSRF protections on sensitive endpoints.

MitigationImplement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) on all state-changing operations (POST/PUT/DELETE requests), validate Origin/Referer headers server-side, and set SameSite attribute on session cookies.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed TubePress.NET version
    Locate the TubePress.NET plugin/component in your application and determine its version number, typically found in a version file, plugin metadata, or header comment
    Affected if The installed version is 4.0.1 or any earlier version within the 4.x line
  2. Locate state-changing endpoints
    Review the application codebase for endpoints that perform actions via POST, PUT, or DELETE requests, such as settings updates, content management, or user actions
    Affected if The application contains state-changing endpoints and the installed version is 4.0.1 or earlier
  3. Inspect endpoints for anti-CSRF token requirements
    Examine the state-changing endpoint handlers to determine whether they require a synchronizer token (anti-CSRF token) to be submitted with the request
    Affected if State-changing endpoints do not require valid anti-CSRF tokens and the installed version is 4.0.1 or earlier
  4. Verify Origin/Referer header validation
    Check the server-side code for validation of Origin or Referer HTTP headers on state-changing requests
    Affected if The application does not validate Origin or Referer headers on state-changing requests and the installed version is 4.0.1 or earlier
  5. Check session cookie SameSite attribute
    Inspect the session cookie configuration to determine if the SameSite attribute is set
    Affected if Session cookies lack the SameSite attribute and the installed version is 4.0.1 or earlier

A user is affected if they are running TubePress.NET version 4.0.1 or earlier AND their application exposes state-changing endpoints that lack CSRF protection mechanisms (missing anti-CSRF tokens, no Origin/Referer validation, or no SameSite cookie attribute).

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) on all state-changing operations (POST/PUT/DELETE requests), validate Origin/Referer headers server-side, and set SameSite attribute on session cookies.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,440
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,904.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-22559 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-22559 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data