CVE-2025-22589
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in bozdoz Quote Tweet quote-tweet allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Quote Tweet: from n/a through <= 0.7.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCSRF vulnerability in the Quote Tweet WordPress plugin (version <= 0.7) allows remote attackers to trick authenticated administrators into executing unintended actions via maliciously crafted requests, leading to Stored XSS where malicious JavaScript gets persisted in the quote-tweet functionality and executes for other users viewing the content.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Quote Tweet plugin installation and versionInspect the plugin's main PHP file (e.g., quote-tweet.php) for the version constant, or view the plugin in WordPress admin under Plugins > Installed PluginsAffected if Quote Tweet plugin is installed and version is 0.7 or lower
-
Verify the plugin is activeCheck WordPress admin > Plugins or query the wp_options table for the active_plugins optionAffected if Plugin is installed and active in the WordPress environment
-
Inspect plugin for missing CSRF nonce protectionReview the plugin's PHP source code (especially form handlers and AJAX endpoints) for wp_nonce_field, wp_verify_nonce, or check_admin_referer calls on state-changing operationsAffected if State-changing functions (form submissions, AJAX calls) lack nonce validation logic
-
Inspect plugin for missing output sanitizationReview the plugin's PHP source code where quote tweet content is displayed (e.g., using echo or print) for sanitization functions like esc_html, esc_attr, or sanitize_text_fieldAffected if Quote tweet content is output without proper sanitization functions, allowing XSS execution
A user is affected if the Quote Tweet plugin (version 0.7 or lower) is installed, active, and lacks both CSRF nonce protection on state-changing operations and output sanitization on displayed content.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF nonce validation on all state-changing operations (form submissions, AJAX calls) and ensure proper output sanitization when displaying quote tweets to prevent XSS execution.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-22589 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-22589 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data