CVE-2025-22658
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Listings for Appfolio Listings for Appfolio listings-for-appfolio allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Listings for Appfolio: from n/a through <= 1.2.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Listings for Appfolio WordPress plugin (versions <= 1.2.0) allows authenticated attackers to inject malicious JavaScript through stored XSS by tricking administrators into submitting crafted requests.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Listings for Appfolio plugin is installedIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'Listings for Appfolio' in the listAffected if Plugin is not found in the installed plugins list
-
Check if the plugin is activeIn Plugins > Installed Plugins, verify the 'Listings for Appfolio' plugin has an 'Active' status indicatorAffected if Plugin is not active - vulnerability cannot be exploited
-
Determine installed plugin versionClick on the plugin name in the plugins list to view details, or check the plugin header in /wp-content/plugins/listings-for-appfolio/listings-for-appfolio.php for the 'Version' fieldAffected if Version cannot be determined or is <= 1.2.0
-
Compare version to affected rangeCompare the installed version number to the affected range: any version <= 1.2.0 is vulnerableAffected if Installed version is 1.2.0 or lower
If the Listings for Appfolio plugin is active and the installed version is 1.2.0 or lower, the environment is affected by this CSRF/stored XSS vulnerability
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate Listings for Appfolio to the latest version and implement anti-CSRF tokens on all state-changing forms.
Latest available version (likely 1.2.1 or higher)
- 1. Log in to your WordPress admin dashboard
- 2. Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins
- 3. Locate 'Listings for Appfolio' plugin
- 4. Check if an update is available and update to the latest version
- 5. Verify the update was successful
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-22658 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-22658 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data