CVE-2025-22723
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type vulnerability in Dmitry V. (CEO of "UKR Solution") Barcode Scanner with Inventory & Order Manager barcode-scanner-lite-pos-to-manage-products-inventory-and-orders allows Upload a Web Shell to a Web Server.This issue affects Barcode Scanner with Inventory & Order Manager: from n/a through <= 1.6.7.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceUnrestricted file upload vulnerability in the Barcode Scanner with Inventory & Order Manager allows attackers to upload arbitrary file types including web shells. The application fails to validate uploaded files, enabling remote code execution through malicious PHP or other executable files.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Barcode Scanner with Inventory & Order Manager is installedSearch for application files, check web server document roots, or look for inventory management system installations. Examine installed software lists or application directories.Affected if The application is present in the environment
-
Determine the installed versionCheck application version information - typically found in about pages, configuration files, composer.json, or application metadata within the installation directory.Affected if Version cannot be determined or falls within an unpatched release
-
Locate the file upload functionalityIdentify if the application has inventory import, bulk upload, document attachment, or barcode image upload features. Search for upload forms or API endpoints that handle file submissions.Affected if File upload capability exists and is accessible to users
-
Identify the upload storage locationCheck application configuration for upload directories. Common paths include /uploads, /attachments, /imports, or custom paths defined in config files.Affected if Uploaded files are stored within the web-accessible directory
-
Verify file type validation is absent or weakTest the upload mechanism with a harmless test file (e.g., a text file renamed to .php). Observe whether the application accepts files without validating content type or extensions.Affected if The application accepts and stores files with executable extensions (e.g., .php, .exe, .sh) without validation
A user is affected if the Barcode Scanner with Inventory & Order Manager is installed, the file upload feature exists, and uploaded files are stored in a web-accessible location without proper validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict allowlist-based file type validation, verify actual file content (magic bytes), store uploads outside web root or with non-executable permissions, and consider upgrading to a patched version once available.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-22723 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-22723 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data