CVE-2025-22799
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in vertim Neon Product Designer neon-product-designer-for-woocommerce allows SQL Injection.This issue affects Neon Product Designer: from n/a through <= 2.2.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL Injection vulnerability in the Neon Product Designer plugin for WooCommerce (versions up to 2.2.0) allows attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through unsanitized user input, potentially enabling unauthorized data access, modification, or deletion of database contents.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Neon Product Designer plugin is installedAccess WordPress admin panel, navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins, and locate 'Neon Product Designer' or 'Product Designer for WooCommerce' in the list. Alternatively, check the wp-content/plugins directory for a folder named 'neon-product-designer' or similar.Affected if The plugin is present in the WordPress/WooCommerce installation
-
Check installed plugin versionIn WordPress admin, click on the Neon Product Designer plugin to view its details, which typically displays the version number. Alternatively, check the main plugin PHP file for a 'Version:' comment or the plugin header information.Affected if The installed version is 2.2.0 or any version below it (versions 'up to 2.2.0' are affected)
-
Identify plugin endpoints handling user inputReview the plugin code to locate files that process user-submitted data (typically files handling product customization, design submissions, or cart functionality). Look for PHP files with $_GET, $_POST, or $_REQUEST superglobals used in database queries.Affected if The plugin processes user input through form submissions or URL parameters in any product designer functionality
-
Inspect web server logs for SQL injection attemptsReview access logs (typically in /var/log/apache2/, /var/log/nginx/, or your hosting provider's log viewer) for requests to Neon Product Designer endpoints containing SQL syntax patterns such as UNION, SELECT, INSERT, DROP, or single quotes combined with equals signs in query parameters.Affected if Log analysis reveals suspicious SQL-like patterns in requests targeting the plugin
A user is affected if Neon Product Designer plugin is installed with version 2.2.0 or lower and the plugin handles user input, which is its core function in WooCommerce product customization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to a patched version of Neon Product Designer that implements proper sanitization and parameterization of SQL queries to neutralize special elements.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-22799 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-22799 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data