CVE-2025-22884
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDelta Electronics ISPSoft version 3.20 is vulnerable to a Stack-Based buffer overflow vulnerability that could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code when parsing DVP file.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceStack-based buffer overflow in Delta Electronics ISPSoft v3.20 when parsing specially crafted DVP files, allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the targeted user.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.21CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify ISPSoft is installedCheck the system for ISPSoft installation directories or look for ISPSoft in the Windows installed programs list (Control Panel > Programs and Features)Affected if ISPSoft is found installed on the system
-
Identify the installed ISPSoft versionLocate the ISPSoft executable (typically in Program Files or Program Files (x86)) and check its file properties, or look for version information in the installation folderAffected if The version shown is earlier than 3.21 (for example, 3.20, 3.11, 3.0, or any version number below 3.21)
-
Confirm DVP file parsing functionality existsVerify that the ISPSoft installation includes DVP file handling capabilities by checking for .dvp file associations or the presence of parsing-related components in the installation directoryAffected if DVP file parsing functionality is present in the installation
-
Check for recent DVP file usageReview the system for recently opened or modified .dvp files, or check the application recent files list if accessibleAffected if DVP files have been opened with this ISPSoft installation
The environment is affected if ISPSoft version 3.20 or any version earlier than 3.21 is installed and DVP file parsing functionality is available on the system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data3.21
Await vendor patch from Delta Electronics; in the interim, avoid opening untrusted DVP files and isolate affected systems from untrusted networks.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,624.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-22884 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-22884 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data